This is worth repeating.
I've trimmed some of the fat so Bosch's respnse to "John Burgin" is not
obscured. It appears that not only is "John Burgin" (real name??)
ignorant of some basic terms, but (if we can believe him) so are his
alleged medical colleagues and his molecular biologist (apologies to
them if he misrepresents them). Moreover, they do not know how to
write a good Medline search strategy. Bosch wrote one and found ample
documentation of widespread use of a term "John Burgin" had ridiculed
as unheard of...
F. LeFever
(v. infra)
In <marnix-2710981711360001 at bosch4.pabio.washington.edu>
marnix at u.washington.edu (Marnix L. Bosch) writes:
>>In article <36364960.85168152 at netnews.worldnet.att.net>,
>johnburgin at worldnet.att.net wrote:
- - - - - - - -(snip) - - - - - - - - - - - -
>> Not only are you a pompous ass, you're a defensive pompous ass.
Talk
>> to me, us, about "enhancing" antibodies. A few of my other ignorant
>> medical colleagues, including 2 board certified medical pathologist
>> and a molecular biologist are laughing their asses off at your
>> bullshit. Do you really believe that because you say something in
>> scientific jargon that people believe it? If they can't understand
>> what you are saying, and they don't know who you are, why should
they
>> believe you? Come on, talk to us all, o.k., just me about
"enhancing"
>> antibodies. Make your case. No references to medline searches.
They
>> don't bring up the term.
>>PubMed search: enhancing antibodies: 421 hits; enhancing antibodies
AND
>HIV: 43 hits.
>>> MY stupidity is amazing?
>>Indeed
>>Marnix Bosch
