In article <36392cf8.274533302 at netnews.worldnet.att.net>,
johnburgin at worldnet.att.net wrote:
> On 29 Oct 1998 04:09:56 GMT, flefever at ix.netcom.com(F. Frank LeFever)
> wrote:
>> >Again, I've cleared away some of the clutter (a very primitive form of
> >obscurantism). Someone documents that "enhancing antibody" is indeed a
> >widely used term in the scientific literature.
> So is the word "ain't" in literature, but it is just as out of place
> in meaningful discussion of AIDS, and you know it.
> >
> >Obscuring the point:
> No, you are obscuring the obvious, HIV doesn't cause AIDS and throwing
> around a "bunch" of pseudoscientific terms doesn't make your argument
> more credible. Show me the paper boy, HIV causes AIDS. THE PAPER!
> Where is it?
Now stop stamping on the floor like that.
Marnix Bosch
