On Fri, 30 Oct 1998 10:12:51 -0700, marnix at u.washington.edu (Marnix L.
Bosch) wrote:
>In article <36392cf8.274533302 at netnews.worldnet.att.net>,
>johnburgin at worldnet.att.net wrote:
>>> On 29 Oct 1998 04:09:56 GMT, flefever at ix.netcom.com(F. Frank LeFever)
>> wrote:
>>>> >Again, I've cleared away some of the clutter (a very primitive form of
>> >obscurantism). Someone documents that "enhancing antibody" is indeed a
>> >widely used term in the scientific literature.
>> So is the word "ain't" in literature, but it is just as out of place
>> in meaningful discussion of AIDS, and you know it.
>> >
>> >Obscuring the point:
>> No, you are obscuring the obvious, HIV doesn't cause AIDS and throwing
>> around a "bunch" of pseudoscientific terms doesn't make your argument
>> more credible. Show me the paper boy, HIV causes AIDS. THE PAPER!
>> Where is it?
>>Now stop stamping on the floor like that.
>>Marnix Bosch
Can't do it can you? Say it softly to yourself. jb
