Tyson <tyson at canada.com> wrote in message
news:HCW34.123671$V4.1621893 at news2.rdc1.on.home.com...
> ...would appreciate it if anyone could comment on whether or not my
diagram
> (a 25.6kb jpeg attachment on this message) is correct or at least makes
> sense.
I think it is nice and illustrative. I don't know about the proportions
though - isn't your naive T-cell part a little to wide...? Also: your figure
suggests that there are fewer cell left after the secondary response than
after the first. That's not what it says in the textbooks.
Morten
