The only natural mode of Ab (antibody) transmission is via mother child through
secratory IgA dimeric in breast milk. One may get some passive transmissions through
forceful kissing. Ab's cannot be transmitted in the way you attempting to describe.
There are manfactured by pre-primed, activated B-cells (plasma cells) and produced
immunoglobulins to a specific viral epitope. This system is reserved for the infected
host only and not any persons nearby...they just have to get infected for there own
immunity to take hold. Lastly, immunizations wiht live or heat killed virus have the
same overall effect...to prime the immune system. Although there are some inherent
cavets to the former.
Doc 2 B. Tony
maciej simm wrote:
> immunity cannot be communicated in the way you have described. Antibodies are made
> of proteins.
> Best treatment for anything is prevention, and drinking the 8 glasses of water per
> day cannot be
> overephasized (mailny b/c most people cannot go to the bathroom every 40 minutes).
>>RSAMSON18 at cs.com wrote:
>> > You can probably better avoid coming down with the flu by associating with
> > healthy
> > people who have completely recovered from the flu than by getting the weak flu
> > vaccination. The antibodies produced from the actual flu are much stronger
> > than
> > those from the present vaccine. In fact, for someone with a strong immune
> > system,
> > the flu vaccine may weaken their response to the actual virus. Perhap, a
> > different
> > approach might be taken. Vaccinate individuals with strong immune systems
> > with
> > the actual virus and then have them spread their antibodies around after they
> > have
> > defeated the virus. Vaccinating into muscle while maintaining a high level of
> > Vitamin C in serum to provide antidotes for the macrophages should contain the
> > virus to the vicinity of the injection but allow antibodies to spread
> > throughout the
> > body.
> > The relatively poor showing of this year's flu shots suggests some rethinking.
> > Ralph L. Samson
> > ---
