question about making phenol/TE and
ChenHA
hzhen at freeuk.com
Sun Sep 17 20:29:51 EST 2006
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 01:01:04 GMT, dk at no.email.thankstospam.net (DK)
wrote:
>Point taken but I've *never* seen a pre-cast gel that was of higher
>quality than anything I've poured myself. I've seen plenty of
>atrocious pre-cast gels though.
Try Nupage Novex midigel. It works well, and I can actually see
peptides well separated and which failed to show previously in
home-made tris-tricine gelsl as well as another precast gel from
another company.
But for proteins in general, I use gel I made myself.
> In the past four years, I had a gel
>leaking exactly one time (and my gel rig is 11 years old original
>Bio-Rad mini which does have its design problems).
>
>That said, I'd happily use precast gels for something that does not
>require quality (fraction analysis, purity assessment, etc) if they cost
>3X less than they are now. At $10/gel, when a lab runs on
>average ~ 6 gels a day, is a bit too much.
>
>Obviously there is always a fine balance between saving time and
>saving money. Ultimately, it comes to down to whether one believes
>that all lab work is "lab monkey" type.
>
>DK
More information about the Methods
mailing list