qPCR negative controls
Peter Ellis
via methods%40net.bio.net
(by pjie2 from cam.ac.uk)
Mon Apr 16 01:48:48 EST 2007
Gerardine.Persson from gmail.com wrote:
>
> My questions:
> - What exactly is actually amplified here? I've had many students ask
> me, and I grow tired of answering "I don't know, stop asking"
It'll vary from lab to lab depending on the source of the contamination. It
could be carry-over from your actual samples (and the CT will vary depending
on the amount of carry-over), or it could just be primer dimer, in which
case a melt curve will show you that it's a different amplicon from the one
found in wells with template.
The only way to tell for sure what it is is to clone it and sequence it. If
it's the same sequence as the correct amplicon, then the answer is
(unfortunately) that one or other of your reagents has been contaminated.
If you want to isolate the source of the contamination, you could run a
series of different negatives leaving out different components of the
reaction - leave out primer A, primer B or template in varying combinations.
I'll bet dollars to donuts it'll be something like someone forgetting to
change a pipette tip when setting things up, and thus transferring a
fractional amount of template into either your primer aliquots, the enzyme
mix itself, or even your water aliquot.
It *is* possible to get true negative controls, honestly!
Peter
More information about the Methods
mailing list