Question on recombination in E.coli and in baculovirus
Kay Schink
via methods%40net.bio.net
(by k.schink from gmail.com)
Mon Mar 3 07:54:45 EST 2008
DK wrote:
> I am considering co-expressing three proteins from the same
> baculovirus. For that, a transfer plasmid from Novagen is
> available which has two polh promoters and two p10 promoters.
> Each of the same promoters is found on different strand
> (i.e., one strand has one polh and one p10 and another strand
> has one polh and one p10) "to minimize recombination" according
> to the company. Promoters are ~ 70 and 90 bp.
>
> More than that, I might need to express two of the proteins
> as fusions with the same small protein (162 bp). There is no
> problem placing those on different strand.
>
> Because I don't really know much about homologous
> recombination in either system, I worry if there are caveats
> related to recombination and resulting instability of the
> 1) transfer vector in E.coli 2) resulting baculoviral DNA
> in the insect cells.
>
> Please give opinions on potential problems with the approach.
> I always, of course, can go the route of co-infectin with three
> separate viruses, painful as it is.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dima
>
There was an article in Nature Methods some time ago that might answer
some of your questions. The authors describe a baculovirus system
suitable for the expression of whole protein complexes from one virus.
This system is based on Invitrogens BacToBac-System but was modified so
multiple transfer vectors can be integrated into the the bacmid
harbouring the baculovirus genome. While there seems little probles
associated with recombination in E.coli, even within the large
baculovirus genome, the authors describe some problems with the
stability of viruses if they are repeatedly overamplified. If this does
not work out, you could always generate an individual baculovirus
expressing each protein alone and coinfect cells with the same MOI.
Best wishes
Kay
@article{
Author = {Fitzgerald, D. J. and Berger, P. and Schaffitzel, C. and
Yamada, K. and Richmond, T. J. and Berger, I.},
Title = {Protein complex expression by using multigene baculoviral
vectors},
Journal = {Nat Methods},
Volume = {3},
Number = {12},
Pages = {1021-32},
Note = {1548-7091 (Print)
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't},
Abstract = {Elucidation of the molecular basis of
protein-interaction networks, in particular in higher eukaryotes, is
hampered by insufficient quantities of endogenous multiprotein
complexes. Present recombinant expression methods often require
considerable investment in both labor and materials before multiprotein
expression, and after expression and biochemical analysis these methods
do not provide flexibility for expressing an altered multiprotein
complex. To meet these demands, we have recently introduced MultiBac, a
modular baculovirus-based system specifically designed for eukaryotic
multiprotein expression. Here we describe new transfer vectors and a
combination of DNA recombination-based methods, which further facilitate
the generation of multigene cassettes for protein coexpression (Fig. 1),
thus providing a flexible platform for generation of protein expression
vectors and their rapid regeneration for revised expression studies.
Genes encoding components of a multiprotein complex are inserted into a
suite of compatible transfer vectors by homologous recombination. These
progenitor constructs are then rapidly joined in the desired combination
by Cre-loxP-mediated in vitro plasmid fusion. Protocols for integration
of the resulting multigene expression cassettes into the MultiBac
baculoviral genome are provided that rely on Tn7 transposition and/or
Cre-loxP reaction carried out in vivo in Escherichia coli cells tailored
for this purpose. Detailed guidelines for multigene virus generation and
amplification, cell culture maintenance and protein production are
provided, together with data illustrating the simplicity and remarkable
robustness of the present method for multiprotein expression using a
composite MultiBac baculoviral vector.},
Year = {2006} }
More information about the Methods
mailing list