In article <3aei0b$76t at news.cs.brandeis.edu>, bradw at cs.brandeis.edu (Brad
Wyble) wrote:
>> More
> specifically, its easy for an individual to maintain a 60 Hz beat, but
> as the frequency decreases, it becomes increasingly difficult to stay
> with it and predict the next beat without maintaining an internal
> counting mechanism of some kind that divides the intervals between beats into
> subintervals.
60 Hz? As in 60 cycles per second? I would be suprised if a human could
resolve individual acoustic events occurring at a rate above about 10-20
Hz. Could you please expand upon this statement? If it's true, I would be
very interested in finding out more.
