In article <3ar3qe$oj at vixen.cso.uiuc.edu>, kspencer at iti.org (Kevin Spencer)
wrote:
> By "deep electroencephalograms", did they mean they were recording
> intracranially? This sounds quite bizarre to me.
Bizarre, is a rather nice way to refer to it. Heath did a lot of
intracranial recording from psychiatric patients in the 60's. Things have
changed a bit since then.
