Stephan Anagnostaras (stephan at ucla.edu) wrote:
} (Dag Stenberg) wrote:
} > The latest SCI we have here, based on 1994, says 3.079
} I don't take these impact factor ratings very seriously in Neuroscience;
} some of the ratings are flatly absurd. One of these is Neuroreport's
} which actually has quite a high rating.
Yes? Nobody takes them seriously, and everybody takes them into account.
Do you mean that Neuroreport has a too high rating for its prestige?
