In Article<4pf0te$kt6 at ren.cei.net>, <lkh at mail.cei.net> writes:
> Ron-Jim;
> Actually, we are extensions of lower species. Look at the evolutionary
> growth of the brain in relation to species and you will see an
> additive process where spieces grow, then expand into additions then
> grow and expand. etc. We just happen to occupy the top rung.
> lkh
>
I doubt Darwin would agree on this point. The "top rung" of what? The
notions of "higher and lower" were not Darwinian. As I recall, Huxely
addressed this in his presentation to the Royal Academy. I believe he
slammed Wilburforce (sp) for a similar misrepresentation.
