kenneth paul collins <KPCollins at postoffice.worldnet.att.net> writes:
>...there is an unusual aspect of Duality Theory's understanding...
>it is that, if the understanding is attacked and/or rejected,
>before it is understood, the theory's position becomes
>substantiated in the very act of "rejecting" it... (for those who
>have it, see AoK, Ap10)...
It sounds as though Duality Theory cannot be disproven, which would
mean it's not a scientific theory -- its predictions must be falsifiable.
In that case, this newsgroup is really not an appropriate forum to
discuss this theory.
Kevin
-----------------------------------------------------------
Kevin Spencer
Cognitive Psychophysiology Laboratory and Beckman Institute
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
kspencer at p300.cpl.uiuc.edu
-----------------------------------------------------------
