IUBio

picrospritz vs. iontophoresis vs. syringe

Richard Vickery Richard.Vickery at unsw.edu.au
Thu Mar 13 23:42:54 EST 1997


Neal Prakash wrote:

>Does anyone have experience, opinions, or references as to the
>advantages/disadvantages of using these methods to inject small amounts of
>compounds into the brain while simultaneously recording from extracellular
>single units?

I have a reference, experience with one, but some opinions on all three.
The reference is
Federov NB and Reymann KG (1993) J Neurosci Methods  50:83-90
in which they compare the effects of picospritzing (pneumatic pressure 
ejection) and iontophoresis.

The opinion is that it is different horses for different courses.
Syringe pressure ejection is good for bigger volumes, but mainly a fairly 
slow process.  Whether the time course of ejection is important depends on 
what you aim to do.

Picospritzing can allow very short pulse times.  This is the main point of the 
reference above.  I would add a caveat that although the authors used a 25ms 
pulse, the actual rise-time of drug action is 400ms - an order of magnitude 
longer.  In a recent paper of mine using iontophoresis: Vickery R.M. & Bindman 
L.J.  (1997) Long-lasting decreases of AMPA responses following postsynaptic
 activity in single hippocampal neurons. Synapse 25: 103-106, I used longer 
pulses (500ms) but the response rise-time and duration were very similar to 
the very short picospritzing pulse effects.  Where volumetric changes are 
important (stretch-activated channels etc) then iontophoresis is probably 
preferable.

Iontophoresis is slower than spritzing, but is better if you are using potent 
channel antagonist because you can retain the ion whereas the other systems 
have difficulty preventing diffusion (though most can prevent actual flow).  
Iontophoresis requires charged species whereas the other two methods don't, so 
the precise nature of what you want to deliver is critical.  Iontophoresis 
should generally be done with a second barrel providing a balance current to 
minimize direct electrical effects on the cell under study.

Hope this helps,

(we've just ordered a 4 channel spritzer mainly 'cos we want to use it for 
retrograde tracer dye ejection as well as for drug work)



Richard Vickery                  Our quest is for Meaning,         \ /
Physiology & Pharmacology          but the meaning is The Quest.  (oVo)
UNSW, Australia                                                   )   (
http://acsusun.acsu.unsw.edu.au/~s8970107/     Life's a Hoot!      ^ ^



More information about the Neur-sci mailing list

Send comments to us at biosci-help [At] net.bio.net