> Seems to me I saw somebody's comment to the effect that AI systems do
> not HAVE to mimic natural systems and can stand on their own; but
> unless more novel/elegant/interesting as pure creations than these
> simplistic diagrams seem to imply, I see no point in pursuing such
> schemes even as a hobby or game...
>> F. Frank LeFever, Ph.D.
> New York Neuropsychology Group
>>>>>I would agree that AI systems do not have to mimic natural systems. But a
reduction to practice by using the natural components in conscious
biological systems in an AI environment has advantages.
For example, transistors can be used as self organizing maps forming
harmonic string memory in a linear trap of 45 years by using a Paul trap
frequency of 28 hertz. Classical confirmation of information is required
for harmonic self organizing memory maps stored in oppositional reciprocal
eigenfunctions. Because transistors are quantum devices information can be
self organized instantaneously as long as the organization is confirmed
classically. Memory is local occurring as a perceptron or oscillon and
global stored in the linear trap of 45 years. Memory is limited to 3.24
trillion qubits per transistor. Since the memory is additive the global
memory system is limited to the total number of self organizing maps that
can be formed in harmonic memory for all the transistors in the system.
Such a system is likely to be superior to humans.
This models the correlational opponent processing or associational
reciprocal inhibition in biological systems. Biological systems have
oppositional wavelet information working at a Paul trap frequency of 40
hertz. Biological systems use a linear time trap of the life of the
individual.
Ron Blue
http://www.neutronicstechcorp.com
