Peter Seebach <seebs at plethora.net> schrieb in im Newsbeitrag:
PbH_3.2645$X5.359954 at ptah.visi.com...
> In article <81e13t$lig$1 at newsserver.rrzn.uni-hannover.de>,
> Frank Buckler <fb at m2.ifb.uni-hannover.de> wrote:
> >All science have to make the asumtion thats its object is deterministic.
>> I don't see why. Guesses are better than no guesses.
-Assumtions are best guesses.
-The asumtion of determinism (in the way I ment) says not that there ist no
probalistic behavior.
Probalistic behavior is a deterministic behavior of high (unknown)
complexity. (also an asumtion)
Frank Buckler
p.s. I agree to the difference of deterministism and computability.
