mat wrote in message
<43525ce3.0208031227.68be6d5 at posting.google.com>...
>[...]
>violates Popper's principle of falsifiability which many take as a
>criterion for considering a theory as *science*.
i trust, since you know how to use 'pub-med', that you've been
racking-your-brains trying to find something, anything, through which
you could put NDT's stuff to the test.
[in acord with the "invitation" that's been in AoK's Preface all
along]
I'll only be =Delighted= if you, or anyone else, can find anything.
At least, then, I could start Living-for-myself, stop begging, buy a
new car, find a job [i could tell folks who've shied away from hiring
me because they've heard of what i've done with my life that "it was
all just a big mistake. my buddy, mat, helped me find my way back to
reality" :-] and, with that good-news, surely, they'd hire me.
instead, all i've got is increasing misery, and folks accusing me of
'wallowing-in-it'.
why not present something that puts NDT's stuff to the test?
i know of nothing.
it's not my 'fault' that NDT is just that strong.
Thank the 'evolutionary'-engineer for that.
I've only Analyzed its work, and it's work is pretty-damn-Good, so,
so is NDT.
Neither is this a 'boast'.
It's just Truth with respect to nervous system structure and
dynamics.
So, see?
In the end, mat, there just aren't-any-'fish' where you're casting
your bait :-)
k. p. collins
