IUBio

brain sizes: Einstein's and women's

John Knight johnknight at usa.com
Mon Aug 5 02:19:38 EST 2002


Not even feminized American "men" are THIS bad.  parsetree is NOT a man, no
matter what it thinks.

And since it decided not to answer the question about how many Americans
Gallup must poll in order to get an accuracy of plus or minus 2%, let's
answer it for it.

Gallup bases it's surveys on polls of 2,000 Americans, and they are accurate
to within plus or minus 2%, EXCEPT that they are now run by jews, and these
jews have an agenda, and that agenda is to overthrow the government of the
United States, which means that the built-in bias in the poll questions is a
bigger hindrance to getting at the truth than any large sampling error that
might possibly exist in their polling methodology.

John Knight

"The 9th Witch" <Thec at inthe.net> wrote in message
news:3d4d1bc2.31949120 at news.cis.dfn.de...
> On Sun, 04 Aug 2002 10:51:01 GMT, "Richard C. August"
> <raugust at ptd.net> yelled from the fourth floor ward window, and
> subsequently was sedated:
>
> *>Dear 9th Witch,
> *>
> *>One thing John and I have learned in our "Battle of the Sexes" is
> that a
> *>FEMBOT is a FEMBOT is a FEMBOT, no matter to which gender they
> belong.  And
> *>FEMBOTS have so badly blurred the lines between the genders that a
> woman is
> *>now considered "male" if she flattens her chest and wears men's
> clothing,
> *>and a man is now considered a "woman" if he wears a wig, dress, and
> high
> *>heels.
>
> Yet none of this is a consideration in John's statistics.   He wanted
> to know why the US government spent more money to educate women. Parse
> falls into neither category.
>
> *>
> *>Whether male or not, whether a US Citizen or not, Parse Tree
> exemplifies the
> *>best that FEMBOTISM can ever present us.  When asked a simple
> question, he
> *>dodges.  When presented with simple facts or statistics, he
> WHIIIIIIINES.
>
> I've not seen that.
>
> *>When told that the Church Pastoral Office is skilled labor, he coos
> that it
> *>is not.  After all, how can being a church congregation's resident
> *>theologian, Bible interpreter and teacher, student catechiser,
> instructor in
> *>the Word of God, meditation leader, and visitor of the sick and
> invalid
> *>possessing a good bedside manner, be a skilled laborer when he's
> neither a
> *>mathematician nor a draughtsman-engineer?
>
> They can't.  Many's the preacher, some with schooling, some without.
> Nearly anyone can be one, negating the "skilled" part of "skilled
> laborer".
>
>
> *>
> *>Really, Canadian male though he may be, he really is the best US
> Woman I've
> *>ever seen.
>
> Yet no US money was spent to educate him.
>
> *> Perhaps his ilk can heighten and enlighten the Canadian
> *>Educational System to the same level as the US Schools:  THIRD from
> the
> *>BOTTOM, with GIRLS scoring DEAD LAST.
> *>
>
> Can you give me a valid reason as to why that is?  I have my ideas,
> but refrain from assigning blame. Who's fault it is is irrelevant. It
> needs to be fixed.  Perhaps assuring our children that they would be
> safe in school would be a good starting point.  You did notice that
> homeschooled children did better than publicly educated, did you not?
> Without a dime of 'government' money spent on them.
>
> END REPLY FROM T9W
>
>
> *>Pardon me, Parse Tree, would you be gay, or simply pandering to the
> Feminist
> *>Whine so you can feign masculinity and get laid?
> *>
> *>
> *>
> *>
> *>Sincerely,
> *>
> *>
> *>Richard C. August
> *>
> *>"The 9th Witch" <Thec at inthe.net> wrote in message
> *>news:3d4c0250.44882765 at news.cis.dfn.de...
> *>> On Sat, 03 Aug 2002 16:17:02 GMT, "John Knight"
> <johnknight at usa.com>
> *>> yelled from the fourth floor ward window, and subsequently was
> *>> sedated:
> *>>
> *>> *>"Parse Tree" <parsetree at hotmail.com> wrote in message
> *>> *>news:nCL29.3972$9g7.936910 at news20.bellglobal.com...
> *>>
> *>> *>
> *>> *>Why don't you tell us, Oh Great White Hope For Women, exactly
> how
> *>> many
> *>> *>Americans The Gallup Organization needs to poll in order to get
> an
> *>> accuracy
> *>> *>of plus or minus 2%?
> *>> *>
> *>> *>If you can't answer that question, you will PROVE, once and for
> all,
> *>> that
> *>> *>attempting to educate women is a HUGE mistake, and that spending
> an
> *>> EXTRA $8
> *>> *>trillion only to get THIS is even worse than a HUGE mistake.
> *>> *>
> *>>
> *>> Damn, you're stupid.  Parse is male and Canadian, you dumb twit.
> You
> *>> make Forrest Gump look like a brainiac.
> *>>
> *>> T9W
> *>>
> *>
> *>
>





More information about the Neur-sci mailing list

Send comments to us at biosci-help [At] net.bio.net