Parse Tree wrote:
> "John Knight" <johnknight at usa.com> wrote in message
> news:Exe49.4639$eb.342817 at news2.west.cox.net...>>>"Bob LeChevalier" <lojbab at lojban.org> wrote in message
>>news:ela2lugmkrgvem5jtka73d5qjetal9csh3 at 4ax.com...>>>>>"John Knight" <johnknight at usa.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>The biggest errors in the Gallup Polls aren't statistical, but the bias
>>>>introduced because they're an obvious advocacy group.
>>>>>>"Obvious" to you perhaps.
>>>>>>But if they are biased, then they are biased, and all the statistical
>>>flim-flammery in the world won't make their results any more
>>>meaningful than your silly internet poll. Bias negates the
>>>possibility of useful statistical analysis.
>>>>>>lojbab
>>>>Only to a simple minded fool who can't even comprehend what an average is
>>could this be true.
>>>>To almost everyone else, which is like up to 93% of the American public,
>>knowing which way Gallup is biased makes even their biased polls very
>>useful.
>>http://christianparty.net/sodomy.htm>>>>For one thing, when a credible publication like The Statistical Handbook
>> on
>>>the American Family notes that 86% believe that sodomy is wrong, and
>>Worldnet Daily finds that only 6% believe fags should be included in the
>>GOP, and Be Counted finds that only 9% believe that fags should be able to
>>get married, and when the Field Poll shows that 55% favor initiatives to
>> ban
>>>sodomy, and when the Howard W. Odum Survey shows that 72% oppose the
>>legalization of sodomy, and when a Pascoe Poll shows that only a third of
>>Vermont's voters want sodomy to be "legalized", and when a Harris Poll
>> shows
>>>that 83% oppose "same-sex marriages", and when two thirds of California
>>voters passed an initiative to BAN "gay marriages", then when Gallup comes
>>along and gaily and delightfully announces on March 10,1999:
>>>>"Some Change Over Time in American Attitudes towards
>>>>Homosexuality, but Negativity Remains"
>>http://christianparty.net/gallupsodomy.htm>>>>then you know you have either faggots of jews running the show at that
>>once-credible organization--which means it's no longer credible.
>>> Sodomy isn't equivalent to Homosexuality. It includes bestiality and many
> other practices.
>>
Oh? Ew. Bestiality is quite nasty. *shudders* Hrm.Okay. I DON'T support
bestiality and other related practices, but I think homosexuality is
quite fine. Love = love = love. There are many ways of expressing it.
Gender matters not.
