John Knight wrote:
> "Joseph A Nagy Jr" <pagan_prince at charter.net> wrote in message
>>>>You "wiberals" even made a LIE out of his letter regarding "wall of
>>>separation between church and state".
>>>><snip>
>>It was more then a letter, obviously, it became part of the Bill of
>> Rights, which he helped draft.
>>>That wall should be as high as the noon day sun and as thick as the void
>> between here and the edge
>>>of the universe. The religious of this nation (or any nation) should NOT
>> push their views upon those
>>>within in the nation. It is wrong. It breeds hate and resentment. It
>> breeds more fuck heads like
>>>you. It causes war and strife. Religion has probably been the cause of
>> more wars then land and women
>>>combined (and I'd rather fight over a beautiful woman, they are actually
>> WORTH going to war over,
>>>IMO). Jeruselem is the Jewish AND Christian Holy Land. Lets all live in
>> peace and TOLERANCE. Jesus
>>>tried to teach that, but you seemed to have missed the point. Did you even
>> go to Church yesterday,
>>>Mr. Knight?
>>>>> No, it did not become "part of the Bill of Rights". The words "wall",
> "separate" and "separation" don't ever appear anywhere in the entire US
> Constitution. Search for them yourself at
>http://christianparty.net/usconstn.htm>> This was an excerpt from a letter Mr. Jefferson wrote YEARS after the US
> Constitution and the Bill of Rights had been implemented, and you "liberals"
> have taken it entirely out of context. Mr. Jefferson wanted to include the
> word "Christian" in the Bill of Rights, just as it still appears in the
> Virginia Constitution which he helped draft. The "wall of separation"
> referred to his desire to prohibit GOVERNMENT from dictating RELIGION, as it
> now does, like by being one of the only countries in the entire world to
> deny school children the simple right to pray to God.
>> Whether you're a LIAR, or just STUPID, has yet to be seen, Nagy, but if
> you're going to quote Christian men like Mr. Jefferson, GET IT RIGHT.
>> John Knight
>>
I'm neither, just mistaken, Mr. Knight. I apologize for my assumptions.
