We're talking to trees, Mr. August.
> > > OhSojourner wrote:
> > > Now certainly, it is an injustice to force affirmative action/ 50-50
> > > parity that excludes more capable and deserving individuals who happen
> > > to be men. However, it doesn't help your argument when the motive
> > > behind it seems to be one of overt sexism and bigotry.
Here is the most sexist and bigoted feminazi on the internet, and now she's
going to give us a lesson in sexism and bigotry?
She's so full of $2 buzz words that a thought can't possibly enter her head.
Is this what she hopes to teach us? "sexism"? "bigotry"? "you're a Nazi"?
When feminazis do that, you know they're interested only in disrupting the
discussion. In her mind, the disruption is justified, because she knows she
can't prevent us from posting the TRUTH.
John Knight
<raugust at ptd.net> wrote in message
news:5Bk79.7602$Fl.546412 at nnrp1.ptd.net...
> Dear OhSojourner,
>> What the Nazis did was NEVER a good thing.
>> You see, for the "six million Jews" that were "killed" in the "holocaust"
> (read my earlier post regarding the real meaning of that word), there were
> not only a 4% INCREASE in the Indo-European Jewish population according to
> Jewish sources, but 40 million CHRISTIANS were also BRUTALLY MURDERED
whilst
> DEFENDING THEIR OWN HOMES. That's a ratio of 6.66 Christians per Jew
> killed.
>> You once again misunderstand Mr. Knight's posts because of your crass
> overemotionalism. Please, calm down, settle yourself, and read what Mr.
> Knight and I have had to say in a rational manner to you and others.
>>>>> Sincerely,
>>> Richard C. August
>> "OhSojourner" <ohsojourner at aol.com> wrote in message
> news:ce660175.0207211308.724dc65d at posting.google.com...> > [Correction and addition of links below.)
> >
> > ohsojourner at aol.com (OhSojourner) wrote in message
> news:<ce660175.0207210645.959fcfa at posting.google.com>...
> >
> > >
> > [...]
> > >
> > > Mr. Knight: the measure of success goes BEYOND merely having the
> > > ability to score well on a test. What the TIMSS test DOESN'T measure
> > > are *other* highly important factors such as: motivation, enthusiasm,
> > > discipline, willingness to work hard, ability to work well with
> > > people, interest in subject matter, ideas, inspiration, creativity,
> > > etc.
> > >
> > > You wrote:
> > >
> > > >Women got 4% of the patents last year, and my bet is that 95% of
> > > those
> > > >SHOULD have gone to men.
> > >
> > > ...Apparently you feel you need to make guesses about even that 4%,
> > > that somehow even the majority of those 4% couldn't possibly have done
> > > it themselves. ...With of course, absolutely NO evidence other than
> > > your fallacious guesswork based on a test which does NOT take other
> > > factors into account such as insight, inspiration, and creativity. One
> > > can possess these attributes independent of a working knowledge of
> > > mathematices and physics, and I am assuming a patent is awarded to
> > > ORIGINAL inventions, correct? ...Original inventions that were
> > > original because someone was inspired with an IDEA, and that isn't
> > > something that can be easily measured by test-taking.
> > >
> > > >Dead wrong. John Knight
> > >
> > > Admittedly I came into the thread late, and did not read all the way
> > > back. However, I think many of us here can remember this proposal you
> > > authored:
> > >
> > > http://christianparty.net/19threpeal.htm> > >
> > > ...and this one:
> > >
> >
>http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=qMHr5.115480%243E6.1
> 074684%40news1.alsv1.occa.home.com
> >
> > ...Plus, according to what you wrote here, you seem to think that Nazi
> > Germany was good thing:
> >
> >
>http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=qMHr5.115480%243E6.1
> 074684%40news1.alsv1.occa.home.com
> > >
> > > Now certainly, it is an injustice to force affirmative action/ 50-50
> > > parity that excludes more capable and deserving individuals who happen
> > > to be men. However, it doesn't help your argument when the motive
> > > behind it seems to be one of overt sexism and bigotry.
>>
