"John Knight" <johnknight at usa.com> writes:
> "Tom Breton" <tehom at REMOVEpanNOSPAMix.com> wrote in message
> news:m33ctebr78.fsf at panix.com...>> > Joseph A Nagy Jr <pagan_prince at charter.net> writes:
> >
> > > discoveries would have STILL been made, those theories voiced, and our
> world changed. Look at Marie
> > > Curie, one of the more famous female scientists of the 19th Century(?).
> Our present understanding of
> > > X-rays is due to work she pioneered (and she was Polish to boot!).
> >
> > That was Wilhelm Conrad Roentgen. (discovering X-rays, not being
> > Polish) For an overview, see http://www.softcode.com/X_ray.html> >
> > --
> > Tom Breton at panix.com, username tehom. http://www.panix.com/~tehom>> The only thing Marie Sklodowska discovered was how to convince a gentile
> scientist with radiation poisoning to marry her so she could take advantage
> of his weakened mental condition and convince him to give away half of his
> half of a Nobel Prize to her.
I understood they were married long before he got radiation poisoning.
ISTM she got half of that Nobel because of old male chivalry. Nothing
to do with radiation poisoning or Jews/Gentiles.
> Marie and her daughter set the French so far behind in nuclear research that
> it's most likely she was part of a zionist plot to sabotage France
>http://christianparty.net/curie.htm
You know, I agree her accomplishments have been Feministly exaggerated
out of all proportion, but I certainly don't agree she set back France
or nuclear research. AFAICT, she was a very capable assistant to
Pierre. It's not a negative thing.
> ps--the jews raised hel. and called the French "anti-semites" when they
> refused to give her the positions they wanted her in. How can the French be
> "anti-semites" unless she was a jew just like the rumors suggested she was?
I really don't care whether she was Jewish.
--
Tom Breton at panix.com, username tehom. http://www.panix.com/~tehom
