"Bob LeChevalier" <lojbab at lojban.org> wrote in message
news:tel1mu47v9l2n97g75turat67ks4q22uci at 4ax.com...
> "John Knight" <johnknight at usa.com> wrote:
> >The problem with presuming that Marie's contribution was anything other
than
> >"artistic", as Pierre wrote, is that we haven't a shred of evidence that
> >there has been a woman "physicist" in the century since Marie got the
Nobel
> >Prize who feminazis can quote with such regularity.
>> There have been other women, Nobelists. Marie Curie has been cited
> repeatedly because YOU would say about anyone more recent that they
> were benefitting from affirmative action, but also because she is one
> of the most well known of physicists.
And you would NOT say this? Are you claiming that affirmative action was a
failure? Are you claiming that the effort to give incompetents the same
rewards and incomes as the competents didn't work?
Or do you think, after you now know the truth about Marie, that the ONLY
reason a woman would get a Nobel Prize is because of affirmative action and
the "artistic" contribution of women to physics?
btw, Marie is not "one of the most well known of physicists" to anyone
except feminazis and "wiberals". To normal people, she was the "winner" of
a quarter of a Nobel Prize which she was given by her HUSBAND after the
Nobel Committe had awarded half the prize to him. Remember "plus joli d'un
point de vue artistique"? (Do you not think that it would be more satisfying
from the artistic point of view, if we were to be associated in this
manner?"
Did anyone ask "members of the l'Académie des Sciences, including Henri
Poincaré and Gaston Darboux, [who] had nominated Becquerel and Pierre Curie
for the Prize in Physics. Marie's name was not mentioned." what they thought
of that idea?
Or Henri Becquerel, Pierre Curie, Wilhelm C. Röntgen in 1895, Henri
Poincaré, Edmond Becquerel, G. Schmidt, Jacques Curie, Ernest Rutherford in
January 1899, P. Villard in 1900, André Debierne in 1899, and William
Crookes in 1900 who did all of the key research?
Your little feminazi mythology about "gender equality" fell apart a long
time ago, lojbab.
>> >The other problem is that, unless Polish girls are a durn sight smarter
than
> >American girls, then there is no hope of ever discovering another woman
> >"physicist".
>> A quick scan gave Maria Goeppart-Mayer of Germany who shared the Nobel
> physics prize with two others in 1963. Whether there are others, I
> couldn't say without looking more.
>
Well, then I will say it: you won't find any such animal. The closest you
can get is 1963, which was one of the jewish examples of how "smart" women
are, and their model for imposing affirmative action on a country that
didn't want it, and she got a third of an award, just as and for the same
reasons Marie got a quarter of one.
> >Had Marie taken GRE or TIMSS, it's doubtful if she would have been on the
> >upper edge of the female Gaussian Distribution, and even if she was, she
> >would have scored lower than the median for boys. How can physicists
come
> >from this intellectual sphere?
>>http://www.nobel.se/physics/laureates/1903/marie-curie-bio.html>> >After two years, when she took her degree in physics in 1893, she
> > headed the list of candidates and, in the following year, she came
> > second in a degree in mathematics. After three years she had
> > brilliantly passed examinations in physics and mathematics.
>> She finished first in physics and second in mathematics, competing
> against mostly male students, and then was admitted to the Sorbonne as
> a foreign student of the sciences, which itself was no mean feat.
>> lojbab
This page looks very much like jew propaganda. While the jews deny she was
a jew, they raised a ruckus in France by calling the French "anti-semitic"
for failing to promote her to key positions.
Why would they do that if she wasn't a jew?
John Knight
