"Tom Breton" <tehom at REMOVEpanNOSPAMix.com> wrote in message
news:m38z35jvxs.fsf at panix.com...
> "John Knight" <johnknight at usa.com> writes:
>> > "Tom Breton" <tehom at REMOVEpanNOSPAMix.com> wrote in message
> > news:m33ctebr78.fsf at panix.com...> >
> > > Joseph A Nagy Jr <pagan_prince at charter.net> writes:
> > >
> > > > discoveries would have STILL been made, those theories voiced, and
our
> > world changed. Look at Marie
> > > > Curie, one of the more famous female scientists of the 19th
Century(?).
> > Our present understanding of
> > > > X-rays is due to work she pioneered (and she was Polish to boot!).
> > >
> > > That was Wilhelm Conrad Roentgen. (discovering X-rays, not being
> > > Polish) For an overview, see http://www.softcode.com/X_ray.html> > >
> > > --
> > > Tom Breton at panix.com, username tehom. http://www.panix.com/~tehom> >
> > The only thing Marie Sklodowska discovered was how to convince a gentile
> > scientist with radiation poisoning to marry her so she could take
advantage
> > of his weakened mental condition and convince him to give away half of
his
> > half of a Nobel Prize to her.
>> I understood they were married long before he got radiation poisoning.
> ISTM she got half of that Nobel because of old male chivalry. Nothing
> to do with radiation poisoning or Jews/Gentiles.
>> > Marie and her daughter set the French so far behind in nuclear research
that
> > it's most likely she was part of a zionist plot to sabotage France
> > http://christianparty.net/curie.htm>> You know, I agree her accomplishments have been Feministly exaggerated
> out of all proportion, but I certainly don't agree she set back France
> or nuclear research. AFAICT, she was a very capable assistant to
> Pierre. It's not a negative thing.
Being a capable to assistant to Pierre is certainly a positive thing.
Turning it into a feminazi weapon against the sanctity of the family was a
sheer tragedy, and it was mostly women who suffered by it. Taking that
limited role and turning it into a government leadership role in France that
Marie and her daughter and son-in-law couldn't possibly fulfill is believed
by the French to have caused a major setback in their nuclear program. Even
our own Encyclopedia Britannica recognizes that possibility
http://christianparty.net/curie.htm#Anglo
>>> > ps--the jews raised hel. and called the French "anti-semites" when they
> > refused to give her the positions they wanted her in. How can the
French be
> > "anti-semites" unless she was a jew just like the rumors suggested she
was?
>> I really don't care whether she was Jewish.
If she was jewish, then she's closely associated with people who LIE and
plagiarize and STEAL from every non-jew they know, just like Einstein did
http://christianparty.net/einstein.htm . Her "coincidental" discovery of
the properties of thorium at exactly the same time as Schmidt gets even more
suspect. It makes her a suspect as a zionist. It significantly reduces the
probability that she was anywhere near men like Pierre in intellectual
ability http://christianparty.net/timssphysics.htm and that this entire
activity was sponsored by zionists. It suggests that this push for "gender
equality" is not just a local jewish problem, but is an effort by worldwide
zionism. It puts zionists in the position of having sabotaged France's
nuclear program. It means that we need to re-examine every award and prize
and honor ever awarded to either a jew or a woman. It means that we need to
be doubly on the lookout for exactly the same activity in this country. It
could mean that we're already further down the same false path the French
followed.
You should care.
John Knight
