John Knight wrote:
<snip>
> Being a capable to assistant to Pierre is certainly a positive thing.
> Turning it into a feminazi weapon against the sanctity of the family was a
> sheer tragedy, and it was mostly women who suffered by it. Taking that
> limited role and turning it into a government leadership role in France that
> Marie and her daughter and son-in-law couldn't possibly fulfill is believed
> by the French to have caused a major setback in their nuclear program. Even
> our own Encyclopedia Britannica recognizes that possibility
>http://christianparty.net/curie.htm#Anglo
Of course you got it wrong, again. Pierre was an assistant to Marie, leaving his OWN studies in
crystals and symmetry in nature.
>>>>>>>>ps--the jews raised hel. and called the French "anti-semites" when they
>>>refused to give her the positions they wanted her in. How can the
>>> French be
>>>>"anti-semites" unless she was a jew just like the rumors suggested she
>>> was?
>>>I really don't care whether she was Jewish.
>>> If she was jewish, then she's closely associated with people who LIE and
> plagiarize and STEAL from every non-jew they know, just like Einstein did
>http://christianparty.net/einstein.htm . Her "coincidental" discovery of
> the properties of thorium at exactly the same time as Schmidt gets even more
> suspect. It makes her a suspect as a zionist. It significantly reduces the
> probability that she was anywhere near men like Pierre in intellectual
> ability http://christianparty.net/timssphysics.htm and that this entire
> activity was sponsored by zionists. It suggests that this push for "gender
> equality" is not just a local jewish problem, but is an effort by worldwide
> zionism. It puts zionists in the position of having sabotaged France's
> nuclear program. It means that we need to re-examine every award and prize
> and honor ever awarded to either a jew or a woman. It means that we need to
> be doubly on the lookout for exactly the same activity in this country. It
> could mean that we're already further down the same false path the French
> followed.
>> You should care.
>> John Knight
>>
You are truely nuts, aren't you? I mean that above paragraph is filled with so much paranoia and
spin doctoring (that you accuse even the Nobel Prize Committee of doing) that it's not even funny.
