"Joseph A Nagy Jr" <pagan_prince at charter.net> wrote in message
news:3D6500B4.2090706 at charter.net...
> John Knight wrote:
> <snip>
> >>>Why else would jews be 20% of the prize recipients but only .3% of the
> >>
> > world
> >
> >>>population?
> >>
> >>False comparison. The world population is much larger then the number of
> >
> > people who a) Believe in
> >
> >>Judaism and b) are of Jewish decent
> >
> >
> > That's what I just said. To be precise, the world population is 400
times
> > larger than people who a) Believe in
> > Judaism and b) are of Jewish decent.
>> So to say Jews got a higher precentage of the Nobel Prize then the "rest
of the world" is false.
>> >
> > There are 15 million jews in the world, give or take 5 million (since
the
> > jews can't seem to keep track of the jew and change the number by that
much
> > from year to year). But there are more than 6 billion people, of whom 2
> > billion are Christians, which means that there are 133 Christians to
every
> > jew.
>> Thank you for making my arguement.
>
Sheesh, Joseph, you seem to be as bad as those American 12th grade girls.
Let me do the rest of the math for you. If jews are only .25% of the
population, but 20% of Nobel Prize recipients, then they're over-represented
by 20%/.25% = 80 TIMES.
Just as an example, if us honkeys were 80% of the American population but
only 60% of the Nobel Prize recipients, then we'd be under-represented by
.75. This means that compared to honkeys, jews are over-represented by 106
TIMES.
I wasn't "making [your] arguement". I was attempting to communicate with
someone who's evidently one of the grand uneducables.
> >
> > So, then, what's your explanation for why jews get 20% of the Nobel
Prizes,
> > particularly if they were viewed as "feeble minded ... morons" by the US
INS
> > just 80 years ago,
>> Hrm...INS must've been wrong then, eh?
>
No. All the evidence shows that they were right on.
> >since Israel scored even lower than us on TIMSS (466 vs.
> > 501),
>> I don't think public education is easy to come by (or safe) in the middle
east at the moment.
>
Believe me, education in Israel is far easier right now than it is in the
US. I know Israelis with children in schools in Nazareth who even have the
"right" to say a spoken CHRISTIAN prayer in their public classrooms (partly
because Nazareth is 3 hours away from most of the media showcasing by the
jews).
> >and since jews like Einstein had such small brains that they had to
> > plagiarize all "their papers" from White men who published them 10-20
years
> > earlier? http://christianparty.net/einstein.htm>> So you claim.
>
Do you dispute any part of this claim? How? What part do you think is in
error? This was a fairly thorough review of the known literature, and so
far, not a single jew has been able to successfully refute it.
Einstein was a known moron. He flunked algebra. When he "wrote" his
papers, he didn't even have a lab or compatriots or degrees or the slightest
bit of on-hands knowledge of what he "wrote". The people he plagiarized
from wrote to the Nobel Committee and advised them of errors Einstein made
in his translation, but they STILL gave Einstein the prize (and now we know
that they were right and Einstein was wrong, so the integrity, at least, of
the Nobel Prize is in question).
> >
> > It's our jewish "judges" who're kicking competent White men out of
industry
>> So Enron wasn't run by Jews? Damn, I'm sure glad you pointed that out to
us.
>
The man behind the Enron collapse was a jew accountant, something the
jew-controlled media is doing back flips to conceal.
> > so incompetent niggers and women can take their jobs. Why don't they
demand
> > that the Nobel Committee practice affirmative action too?
>> Because it's a prize based on merit? The original intent of AA was to make
sure that hiring was
> based on merit, not skin color. Racial quota's are more harmful then good.
>
No. Affirmative action was *systematic*, forced, institutionalized
*discrimination* against a particular group: qualified White men.
> >
> > The jews on this forum certainly sure are cute little Einstein's, aren't
> > they?
>> I'm not even close to Einstein or Hawking in genius.
>
If you're not close to Einstein "in genius", then you may be in luck.
> >
> >
> >><Snip the bs, remove bionet.neuroscience>
> >>
> >
> > This thread is a bionet.neuroscience thread, so when you snip it out,
they
> > can't follow their own thread.
> >
> > John Knight
> >
> >
>>> But bionet.neuroscience has continuely DEMANDED that YOU stop posting to
their NG as they AREN'T
> interested in this discussion, since it has NOTHING to do with
neuroscience.
>
No "they" have not. This thread started as a bionet.neuroscience thread, so
when you snip it out, they can't follow their own thread. It's the
feminazis who're waving their arms and legs and jumping up and down and
dangling their genitalia all over the usenet in an attempt to disrupt this
bionet.neuroscience thread.
Why would you go along with their little ploy, Joseph?
John Knight
