holzman at panix.com (Dan Holzman) wrote in message news:<ak39u0$jek$1 at panix3.panix.com>...
> In article <JJ899.132$Ic7.42410 at news2.west.cox.net>,
> John Knight <jwknight at polbox.com> wrote:
> >You have to look closely, but Cain is not listed in the genealogy of Adam,
> >which means that Cain was not the genetic offspring of Adam. Seth was, and
> >Noah, Eber, Abraham, and Jacob are his descendants.
>> Genesis 5:1 (KJV)
>> "And Adam knew Eve his wife and she conceived, and bare Cain, and
> said I have gotten a man from the LORD."
>> Oops.
But she didn't say the same thing about Seth and Able, and Seth and
Able WERE listed as a descendant of Adam.
It's the difference in the wording you need to pay close attention to.
Oops.
John Knight
