> > Here's just one example: American men are 1,000 times more likely to be
> > accused, tried, convicted, and sentenced for rape than Italian or
Japanese
> > or Greek men.
>> We also have a significantly higher population then those countries.
When we talk about *rate*, Joseph, we've already adjusted for the higher
population. To clarify this point, let's compare the US to Japan. We have
a population of 284 million, which is slightly more than twice that of
Japan, at 126 million. But we have 593,939 men in prison for rape and
sexual assault, whereas Japan has 365. In absolute numbers, this is a
difference of 1,627 times. But the rate per 100,000 population is what
needs to be compared, which is 209.1 in the US and .29 in Japan. This means
that our prison *rate* is 721 TIMES higher than Japan's. We also have 26
times as many people per capita in prison for drug violations, 17 times for
DUI, 307 times for firearms violations, 92 times for robbery, 55 times for
assault, 194 for homicide, and 23 times for arson.
http://christianparty.net/bonniefisher.htm
This is a comparison of the *rates*. Obviously if we compared the actual
numbers, they would be more than twice that.
Do you believe that American men are that much more likely to be murderers
or rapists than Japanese men?
Why?
John Knight
"Joseph A Nagy Jr" <pagan_prince at charter.net> wrote in message
news:3D670852.4080708 at charter.net...
> John Knight wrote:
> <snip>
> >
> >
> > Changing the laws isn't going to fix the problem.
>> according to you it will.
>> >Upholding existing laws
> > when women are involved,
>> Something else that needs to be done.
>> >and ending the documented, known systemic
> > discrimination against men by the courts and judges and juries, may fix
95%
> > of the problem.
>> I don't think that will fis 95% of the problem, but it will fix a lot of
them.
>> >But as long as jews run the courts, this won't happen.
>> Jews running anything isn't the problem here.
>> >
> > Here's just one example: American men are 1,000 times more likely to be
> > accused, tried, convicted, and sentenced for rape than Italian or
Japanese
> > or Greek men.
>> We also have a significantly higher population then those countries.
>> In Muslim countries men are most likely NOT going to be tried for raping
> a woman or even killing her.
>> >The result is that American men are a third of all the men in
> > the world who are in prison, even though the US is only 4.5% of the
world
> > population. And DNA tests PROVED that at least half of the men who went
> > through the entire legal process did NOT match the DNA from the crime
> > scene--meaning that they were innocent as charged.
>> And hopefully were let go and had their records cleared.
>> >
> > It's entirely possible that HALF of the men currently in prison are
> > INNOCENT, but were convited based on known LIES told by women.
>> It's possible but not likely.
>> >
> > Can you even imagine what this has done to the country?
>> Other then produce people like you? Well, it's overpopulated our prisons,
> victimized innocent people, etc. etc.
>> >And that might be
> > very conservative. If we reduced our prison population 95%,
>> If we reduced it that much that means a lot of actual criminals go free
too.
>> >we'd still have
> > an incarceration rate higher than countries like Japan.
>> Cause we have a higher population then Japan, which equals more people to
> commit crimes.
>> >Is it possible that
> > 95% are innocent? Yes.
>> Not likely.
>> >What Richard described is a TIP of the iceberg.
>> A small iceberg, but one none the less.
>> >
> > What has happened to these hundreds of thousands of women who filed a
> > falsified police report? Nothing. Why not? Because if they were
> > prosecuted for their crimes, crimes which experts like Charles McDowell
> > states are more serious than the original false charge IF it had been
> > completely true, the jewish lawyer cash cow would be dead.
>> Not really. If women are responsible for 80% of consumer spending, then
the
> lawyer cash cow would actually profit even more.
>> >
> > You can't have 2 million men in prison in a country with only 4.5% of
the
> > world's population,
>> Why not?
>> >when there are only 4 million men in prison in the rest
> > of the world with the other 95.5% of the population, and not question
the
> > process.
>> I'd question the process anyways.
>> >
> > Why and how did our legal process get so out of control? STUPID women
like
> > Bonnie Fisher were permitted to get involved in government
> > http://christianparty.net/bonniefisher.htm>> Don't know her, don't trust your web site. You're probably right, though.
We need
> smart women involved with gov't, but that's an oxymoron as all politicians
are
> stupid anywho (at the very least greedy).
>> >
> > It would be bad enough if they were just STUPID. But they're also the
worst
> > criminals on the planet, but they'll never be prosecuted since they're
> > protected because they work for the government.
>> All women work for the gov't?
>> >
> > What is the process that causes this? According to the Bureau of
Justice
> > Statistics:
> > http://christianparty.net/juststat.htm>> Actually that looks like your web site again.
>http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/ascii/spousfac.txt was this the one you
> were referring to?
>> >
> > Men are one fifth as likely as women to be acquitted for the same crime.
>>http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/ascii/spousfac.txt here's a site that
actually
> supports that claim, although they don't give actual numbers.
>> Then introduce fair laws that would secure a true conviction at an equal
rate.
>> >
> > Men are 16% more likely to be imprisoned if convicted.
>> Lets change that then by introducing better laws.
>> >
> > Men receive prison sentences 2.7 times longer than women for the same
crime.
>>http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/ascii/spousfac.txt>http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/1999/01/18/national/main28959.shtml>> Don't forget to cite, John.
>> Lets change that then by introducing better laws.
>> >
> > American men are 1,000 times more likely than Japanese men to be accused
of
> > sexual assault.
>> Well with sex as repressed and taboo as the media makes it out to be (as
well
> as Conservative Christian organizations), it's no wonder the rate is so
much
> higher.
>> >
> > Women are over half of the defendants (55%) in "only" one category of
family
> > murder: parents killing their offspring.
>> well if they didn't kill their children, how can they be prosecuted? Where
is
> your cite (and your web site doesn't count)?
>> >
> > Wives are twice as likely as husbands to kill their spouse with a knife.
>> Really? I better hide all the sharp objects in my house then. *rolls eyes*
>> And men are more likely to kill their spouse with their bare hands. Whats
your
> point? A difference in choice of weapon proves nothing.
> (and yes, I'm looking for a cite about weapons used)
> "Weapons used to kill spouse" = search on Google = no results.
>> >
> > Wives are twice as likely as husbands to initiate a contract to kill
their
> > spouse.
> >
> > It's not that women aren't committing crimes. They aren't being
prosecuted
> > for it.
>> And why's that?
>> >
> > John Knight
> >
> >
> > ps--accusing people of "hate" isn't going to cut it either, Joseph.
>> No it's not, but if the shoe fits, John.
>> You know guys, there is a surprising lack of news stories on DV (at least
> archived news stories). I did several searches on CBS News.com and only
came
> up with that one result I posted. Very sad.
>> Bionet.neuroscience removed as this has moved on to DV.
> Alt.religion
> alt.religion.wicca
> alt.education also removed for same reason.
>
