"Bob LeChevalier" <lojbab at lojban.org> wrote in message
news:jtaemu4j79pp24mu19m3jol2ebrru9l8m6 at 4ax.com...
> His obsessions are multiple; he has expressed hatred for everyone who
> is Jewish, female, black (but he uses the N word), the "mud" races,
> liberals, feminists, scientists who accept evolution and probably a
> few others that I'm forgetting.
>
This is what makes you a "liberal", lojbab. It's also proof that you're a
woman because it's pure "women's intuition"--and you certainly have some
appreciation for just how "accurate" *that* is by now [read: 32% of American
12th grade girls' responses were not statistically significant, 23% were
statistically significant because they scored lower than if they'd just
guessed, and of the 45% that was statistically significant, the amount by
which they scored lower than boys was statistically significant on 24.4%, by
which they scored higher than boys was statistically significant on 2.6%,
and the difference between boys and girls was not stastically significant on
18%"].
"Women's intuition" couldn't be further off the mark than that if you tried,
could it?
Just because someone thinks your sex idol Marie Curie was a lab flunky
doesn't mean they "hate" her, nor does it mean that they "hate" you for
continuing to propogate that LIE even long after she's been debunked. Just
because someone notes that the trainers of Koko the Gorilla claimed that she
was more "intelligent" than the niggers [something not even I agree with]
doesn't mean they "hate" niggers. The refusal of "liberals" and feminazis
to understand what this welfare system has done to nigger families is a sure
fire way to demonstrate their "hate" for niggers.
The zionists and jews just love it when you protect your little feminazi
cocoon so effectively by throwing out all these Pavlovian responses, because
it's proof that their brainwashing of you feminazis and "liberals", through
TalmudVision and the public "school" system, has been a raving success.
As Tom pointed out, you have never *once* addressed a debate issue properly.
Instead, you reacted like Pavlov's Dog, every time. You almost got the
Gallup sample size issue correct, but then zinged off into left field with
another "hate" diatribe and never even completed the thought. This was an
important point, but you never made it properly, and even follow ups to your
posts were rejected as if though they were pointless.
It must really be miserable to live your whole life "thinking" that anyone
who disagrees with you "hates" you? It sure seems to waste a lot of energy.
John Knight
