"Joseph A Nagy Jr" <pagan_prince at charter.net> wrote in message
news:3D68F8AB.4000402 at charter.net...
> Bob LeChevalier wrote:
> > Joseph A Nagy Jr <pagan_prince at charter.net> wrote:
> >
> >>Bob LeChevalier wrote:
> >>
> >>>>A previous complaint was raised in this thread concerning the USA
having the
> >>>>most censorship in the world.
> >>>
> >>>I don't think that we do.
> >>
> >>I disagree. Look at how the news is censored. Look at how people are
wanting others
> >>to be their eyes and ears and to protect them from the great "harm" that
the internet
> >>can do to kids. If you want to protect your kids, then trust them enough
to make
> >>good decisions on what you have taught them. If they can't, then they
will suffer the
> >>consequences (punishment by grounding, spanking, etc.)
> >
> >
> > I am not disagreeing that we have censorship (albeit unofficial). The
> > question is whether we have the most in the world. Many other
> > countries have their heavier censorship at the supply end, with prison
> > sentences for violation. A newsperson who violates news censorship at
> > most loses his job; the broadcasting company loses some viewers or a
> > sponsor. No one is killed or goes to jail.
> >
> > Most of your examples above, BTW, are would-be censorship. Parents
> > WANT the Internet censored to protect the kids, but in fact it is NOT
> > censored, and kids who want to bad enough can get the stuff they
> > aren't supposed to get, and in fact sometimes kids who don't want it
> > can get it.
>> What about forced censorship in public libraries by the gov't?
>> >
> >
> >>>>Pornography is in your livingroom, day and night.
> >>>
> >>There is? Where?
> >
> >
> > His definition of pornography is anything that would not satisfy
> > Victorian mores. He wants the world to live in the monastery that he
> > wishes to live in, so we can all suffer with him.
> >
> > lojbab
>> I dunno...some of the dresses them women wore were NOT "proper" (granted
they
> showed only cleavage, but skin was shown).
>
It's interesting that jojbab would claim that living by Christian principles
would be tantamount to "suffer with him".
Do you really not comprehend Mr. August's point? Is it really impossible
for you to understand his SIMPLE point?
This computer gets bombarded hourly with unwanted pornographic messages.
Children use this computer when naked women pop up all over the place. It's
impossible to get away from Britney Spears. The nigger music is the vilest,
most degenerate form of pornography imaginable.
But mention the Holy Bible, and 20 million jews and niggers and feminazis
and other muds and "liberals" all of a sudden "feel insulted".
This subtle jewish censorship, wherein children can walk into a classroom
with a picture of an almost naked Britney Spears with impunity, but if they
were to tuck a Holy Bible in their school bag they could get charged with
multiple crimes, is simply unacceptable.
Richard's not asking people to "suffer with him". He's asking us to free
the male sex from this incessant, unwanted, pornographic, un-Godly,
anti-Christian, vile, crass, counterproductive, sexist, bombardment of
female sexuality. Enough is enough.
He doesn't have just a *right* to demand this.
Why can't you understand that, as a Christian, he has a *responsibility* to
do so. And he has millennia of "case law" and billions of Christians behind
him.
All you feminazis have behind you is millennia of failures, maybe the 15
million jews in the world, the 1% of the population who're faggots, and a
small percentage of the 33 million niggers in the country (namely the ones
making pornographic nigger music).
Many countries have succeeded in banning American nigger music and
pornography. And those are the countries which don't have the tremendous
social problems we have. You feminazis will NEVER take responsibility for
your evil deeds, so American MEN have to do that, and this is as good a
place as any to START.
John Knight
