"John Knight" <jwknight at polbox.com> wrote:
>It's interesting that jojbab would claim that living by Christian principles
>would be tantamount to "suffer with him".
Living by Mr. August's version of Christian principles would be like
living in a monastery. We have the choice not to do so.
>This computer gets bombarded hourly with unwanted pornographic messages.
I haven't gotten any in at least several hours, probably several days.
Occasionally spammers do hit me, but that is a consequence of my
choice to post on Usenet with my real email address. In your case, I
have no doubt that some people would target you specifically because
of your obnoxious behavior.
>Children use this computer when naked women pop up all over the place.
You have children using your computer? Then they are exposed to YOUR
filth, which is worse than any naked woman.
While I have gotten pornographic spam, I have never gotten a picture
of a naked woman popping up on my computer. I have to open an image
file in order to see it, and I choose not to do so.
>It's impossible to get away from Britney Spears.
Really? I've never met her myself. My kids would love to. I haven't
even seen her picture for at least a week or two (I haven't kept
track).
>The nigger music is the vilest, most degenerate form of pornography imaginable.
Pornography seems to be in the mind of the beholder. If you don't
like it, don't listen to it.
>But mention the Holy Bible, and 20 million jews and niggers and feminazis
>and other muds and "liberals" all of a sudden "feel insulted".
I am more insulted by your presence on the nets than I am by a mention
of the Holy Bible.
I am insulted by your sloppy research, and by claims that you pull out
of your strange orifice, which are so easily disproved.
>This subtle jewish censorship, wherein children can walk into a classroom
>with a picture of an almost naked Britney Spears with impunity, but if they
>were to tuck a Holy Bible in their school bag they could get charged with
>multiple crimes, is simply unacceptable.
I've never seen a kid charged with a crime for carrying a Bible in
their school bag.
>Richard's not asking people to "suffer with him". He's asking us to free
>the male sex from this incessant, unwanted, pornographic, un-Godly,
>anti-Christian, vile, crass, counterproductive, sexist, bombardment of
>female sexuality. Enough is enough.
If a member of the male sex wishes that, they can go join Richard in
his monastery. That is what monasteries are designed for - to lock
men away from the sinful world.
>He doesn't have just a *right* to demand this.
He has the right to demand anything he wants under free speech. We
ave the right to ignore his demands.
>Why can't you understand that, as a Christian, he has a *responsibility* to
>do so.
We don't care what he feels his responsibilities are. We are human
beings with our own rights, and do not need every Christian thinking
that they need to be our parents.
>And he has millennia of "case law" and billions of Christians behind
>him.
He does not. This Christian is not behind him. The multitude of
Christians in Europe who have fewer taboos on sexual display are
obviously not behind him.
Get it through your head: Most Christians do not believe as you do,
and do not believe that Christianity compels or even suggests that
they believe as you do.
You are a loser, not a Christian.
>All you feminazis have behind you is millennia of failures,
Try some simple logic, nincompoop. I doubt that any feminazis have
tried to do anything for millennia, so they can hardly have failed for
millennia.
>maybe the 15
>million jews in the world, the 1% of the population who're faggots, and a
>small percentage of the 33 million niggers in the country (namely the ones
>making pornographic nigger music).
What about them?
>Many countries have succeeded in banning American nigger music and
>pornography.
Which ones are these?
>And those are the countries which don't have the tremendous
>social problems we have.
If they exist, they don't have our freedoms either. In most of them,
you would not be able to post your BS on the net. You are free to
move to any of them if you choose. We won't miss you.
>You feminazis will NEVER take responsibility for
>your evil deeds, so American MEN have to do that, and this is as good a
>place as any to START.
I'm an American man, and I take no responsibility for anyone's deed
but my own.
I do not think you have either the responsibility OR the right to take
responsibility for the deeds of those who you condemn.
lojbab
