"Bob LeChevalier" <lojbab at lojban.org> wrote in message
news:pgnimucbnm8jdg9qhujq4cf6bcl16krpcv at 4ax.com...
> "John Knight" <jwknight at polbox.com> wrote:
> >We have selective censorship. And we have jews controlling the major
"news"
> >sources who put an incredible bias on every word they write [read: they
> >LIE].
>> Read: YOU lie.
>> >Pornography is permissible, but the Word of God is not.
>> False. Liar.
>
This is exactly how our courts are ruling, as we speak. How can you call
this a "lie"?
> >Our
> >jewish-controlled courts routinely punish White children for acting like
> >Christians
>> False. Liar.
Not even once? You're not following the "news"very closely, are you? Or is
this selective women's intuition?
>> >but some stupid nigger kid can publish a song about killing cops
> >and raping his mother with impunity.
>> So can a white kid. It is called "freedom of speech". Don't like it?
> Then leave, and we won't miss you.
We'd rather reclaim this Christian nation and oust the jewish trash.
>> >Not one single adultery law has ever been repealed, but the last
prosecution
> >under this law was more than half a century ago.
>> Good.
>
Thanks for that admission that you support the "right of women to commit
adultery"--making you an accomplice to a serious crime.
> >Cu.ts
>> It's just as obscene and sinful when you leave the letter out. God
> knows what is in your heart.
And we know what's in God's heart when He prescribes stoning of the whores
and harlots, don't we?
>> >like Shere Hite brag on national TV: "70% of American wives commit
> >adultery within 5 years of getting married".
>> Probably similar numbers for men, but you ignore that.
>
Men don't get pregnant.
> >Is this just feminazi braggadocio? No. Barbara Rothman notes in
Recreating
> >Motherhood "Some physicians doing tissue typing for organ donations
estimate
> >that maybe 20% of people are not genetically related to the men claiming
> >fatherhood."
>> So much for racial purity. Just think: 20% of your ancestors may not
> have been the father that is recorded in the genealogy.
>
Just because a woman is an adulteress, a whore and a harlot doesn't mean
she's a race traitor too );
> >If we upheld adultery laws
>> then the laws would be thrown out as unconstitutional.
>
Absolutely no way. You truly are a kook. The reason no adultery law has
been repealed is because they ARE constitutional. Even this pathetic gaggle
of jews and feminazis in the "supreme" court couldn't twist this pretzel
that far, which is why no adultery law has ever been brought before them.
They are not only constitutional, but a Christian nation which fails to
uphold this one Commandment from God is doomed to failure. Your "belief"
that you have some kind of a "right to commit adultery" is truly pathetic.
John Knight
