"4dtvman" <tmitchell-01 at att.net> wrote in message
> > You used to have to enter a back alley or
> > a
> > > fire hall at midnight with a secret password to watch a "girlie" film.
> > You
> > > can now observe "high-quality adult videos" on the Internet for free
or
> > for
> > > a nominal fee. You can now subscribe to HBO, Cinemax, or Showtime and
> > watch
> > > full frontal nudity at midnight. You can discreetly rent or purchase
> > adult
> > > videos to watch in your own privacy.
>> You have a problem with this kind of freedom? I'd fight to the death
> before allowing someone to take away my freedom to watch full frontal
> nudity on videos and pay cable channels. Like Patrick Henry said,
> "Give me liberty or give me death".
>>
This isn't "freedom" you're demanding--this is "license".
And you propose to deny the vast majority American parents the *right* to
protect their children from pornography.
I happen to disagree with Mr. August that pornography is all that harmful to
children. Exposure to feminism and "liberalism" and "humanism" and jews and
nigger music and Mexicans is FAR, FAR more damaging to children than
exposure to nudity.
Exposure to our public "school" system is literally and figuratively child
abuse to many if not most American parents, which makes exposure to nudity
almost trivial by comparison. Exposure to moral minors like the Clinton's,
our supposed "moral leaders", is a billion times worse than seeing Britney
Spears' buns. The anti-Christ, pro-jew jew Yawk Times, which should be
relegated to the junk heap of jewish failures because it can do nothing less
than preserve the world's highest crime, homicide, rape, incarceration, and
divorce rates [read: ours], is worse than Hustler Magazine to many American
parents.
But that doesn't reduce the *rights* by one ounce of the hundreds of
millions of Christian parents to protect their children from the
pornography, blasphemy, and profanity that passes as nigger music and "art".
The notion that nigger profanity should be "protected" because some White
guy might have made a nickel off of owning slaves centuries ago, while
children are prohibited from reading the Holy Bible in the classroom today,
is "license", not "freedom".
John Knight
