Dan Holzman wrote:
>> In article <hw_a9.15521$Ic7.1464026 at news2.west.cox.net>,
> John Knight <jwknight at polbox.com> wrote:
> >
> >> The King James version of the Holy Bible is not an authority on
> >> ancient Hebrew, nor does it assert to being so.
> >
> >It's the most widely spread Hebrew writing ever, and it's primary connection
> >to jews is through words like the following:
>> The KJV of the Bible is not written in Hebrew. The New Testament
> portion of it isn't even translated by many steps from Hebrew.
as i recall, the kjv is the english translation of the latin translation
of the greek translation of the hebrew. (or did it skip the latin?)
