"Matthew Amsel" <matthew.amsel at mail.mcgill.ca> wrote in message
news:3D6CEF06.3C64 at mail.mcgill.ca...
> Dan Holzman wrote:
> >
> > In article <hw_a9.15521$Ic7.1464026 at news2.west.cox.net>,
> > John Knight <jwknight at polbox.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> The King James version of the Holy Bible is not an authority on
> > >> ancient Hebrew, nor does it assert to being so.
> > >
> > >It's the most widely spread Hebrew writing ever, and it's primary
connection
> > >to jews is through words like the following:
> >
> > The KJV of the Bible is not written in Hebrew. The New Testament
> > portion of it isn't even translated by many steps from Hebrew.
> as i recall, the kjv is the english translation of the latin translation
> of the greek translation of the hebrew. (or did it skip the latin?)
The New Testament never WAS in Hebrew. It was in Greek and Latin.
