In article <KY7b9.17497$Ic7.1533164 at news2.west.cox.net>,
John Knight <jwknight at polbox.com> wrote:
>>What it means is that the courts are refusing to uphold one of the most
>important laws in a civilized society, and this law IS a " killed_my_kid
>type of crime", because conceiving the milk man's child through adultery has
>*exactly* the same effect.
This illustrates another thing worth understanding about John. The
"effect" he is referring to above is that a father's biological
child doesn't grow up to give him the immortality-through-children
that John puts lots of importance into.
The fact that "killing my kid" results in a dead kid and adultery
doesn't is completely besides the point to John. This, of course,
tells you everything you need to know about John's attitude towards
women and children both.
No wonder his wife left him. No wonder the courts gave her custody of
the kids.
