On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Bob LeChevalier wrote:
> "John Knight" <jwknight at polbox.com> wrote:
> >"Bob LeChevalier" <lojbab at lojban.org> wrote in message
> >news:2bhrmu462tplq4g3mhji2cbsdqr4kgopt1 at 4ax.com...> >> "Insomniac" <insomniac at winterslight.org> wrote:
> >> >And if he cares so much about kids, how come he wouldn't supporth his own?
> >> >That's right, folks. JK has served time behind bars for non-payment of
> >> >child support.
> >>
> >> Do you and others have the web sites and/or other references that
> >> document the actual existence of JK or Amneus, or whatever his real
> >> name is, and his sordid past?
> >>
> >> There is one site I know of, with a tidbit of bio information, but it
> >> is embedded with stuff on other people and the tone of the site seems
> >> almost as rabidly political as his writing and the claims are as
> >> undocumented as his, so I continue to wonder about its veracity.
> >
> >You know nothing of any "sordid past",
>> That is why I asked. Even though I believe you to be the scum of the
> earth, I think we should hold to higher standards of documenting this
> fact than YOU hold, so I want credible references. At this point, I
> don't even know your real name, which is why "nincompoop" is as good
> as anything.
>> >When feminazis and "liberals" finally resort to LIES like this, we know that
> >you're so desperate that you'll do anything just to have a target to shoot
> >at.
>> You are such an easy target to shoot at, based solely on your
> nincompoop postings, that I have no need to dig up dirt on your past
> in order to have a target to shoot at.
>> >It's the final evidence we need that you cannot and never will be able
> >to defend your failed and degenerate and amoral position.
>> My position is "right in front of my computer", and I see no reason to
> think it has "failed" since if you read it then I sent this posting.
> A standard feet on the floor sitting position is neither degenerate
> nor amoral.
>> >It truly is a pleasure to see you go down in defeat.
>> I haven't gone down to defeat yet against you.
>> >"Women have a right to commit adultery" my as.!
>> Probably your ass indeed. After all, I have never claimed that. You
> only imagine that I have claimed that, because you are almost as
> incapable of understanding English as you are ancient Hebrew or
> Celtic.
Ask Knight how he feels about men and adultery....
"So what? Men don't get pregnant.
"Maybe that's why the Hebrew word na 'aph for adultery in 'Thou shalt not
commit adultery', means 'women that breaketh wedlock'"?
