"John Knight" <jwknight at polbox.com> wrote:
>> You are such an easy target to shoot at, based solely on your
>> nincompoop postings, that I have no need to dig up dirt on your past
>> in order to have a target to shoot at.
>>So then knock off the ad hominems and TRY to respond to the issues.
You have yet to post a real "issue". All you post are your nincompoop
theories and misrepresentations of the facts.
>> >It's the final evidence we need that you cannot and never will be able
>> >to defend your failed and degenerate and amoral position.
>>>> My position is "right in front of my computer", and I see no reason to
>> think it has "failed" since if you read it then I sent this posting.
>> A standard feet on the floor sitting position is neither degenerate
>> nor amoral.
>>Not only is promoting adultery as a "woman's right" amoral,
But since I don't promote adultery as a "woman's right", that is
irrelevant. I merely observed that it is not against the law in the
state of California despite the lie on your website that says it is
based on a 90 year old law that has been removed from the books.
>but it makes you an accomplice to a CRIME.
Sorry, but saying that it is possible for you to rob a bank, does not
mean that I am an accomplice if in fact you DO rob a bank.
>It's no less irresponsible or dangerous to society to promote outright murder.
Certainly. So why do you promote activities that are written in the
law books as "hate crimes"? Does this not make YOU an accomplice to
those hate crimes?
>> >It truly is a pleasure to see you go down in defeat.
>>>> I haven't gone down to defeat yet against you.
>>When you proclaimed that you believed strongly both ways, that school
> prayer has been banned and that school prayer has not been banned,
> you lost all credibility.
I am certain that no fewer people believe me than believed me before I
wrote that.
>Stooping to character assassination was just icing on the cake.
Character assassination? How can I assassinate a character such as
yourself? There is nothing I could say about you that would make you
seem stupider than you already make yourself by your own posts.
>> >"Women have a right to commit adultery" my as.!
>>>> Probably your ass indeed. After all, I have never claimed that. You
>> only imagine that I have claimed that, because you are almost as
>> incapable of understanding English as you are ancient Hebrew or
>> Celtic.
>>Do you recognize the following exchange?:
>>> >Not one single adultery law has ever been repealed, but the last prosecution
>> >under this law was more than half a century ago.
>>>> Good.
>>Are you denying you said this?
No.
>Do you want to clarify your position?
I don't see that it needs to be clarified. You apparently think so.
I think it is good that adultery laws are not prosecuted because the
only way that they could be prosecuted would be if Big Brother was
snooping in our bedrooms to find out who had sex with whom and when.
Since adultery requires an actual act of sex, ONLY bedroom snooping or
paternity testing of any offspring that resulted would prove adultery.
> Do you also feel strongly both ways on adultery?
I don't feel strongly at all on adultery. I don't much CARE about
adultery.
>> Speaking of which, I am waiting for your proof that ancient Celtic and
>> ancient Hebrew were the same language. Can you show me any text of
>> even a sentence in length that means anything remotely similar in both
>> languages? I thought not.
>>You did? Why is that?
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>http://www.british-israel.ca/Celtic.htm
Hilarious. Note that it was posted by someone who says he is a Jew.
Why would YOU believe a site posted by someone who is a Jew?
Meanwhile, he says that the Milesians used the name Eber. Well, yes
they did. But what did the name mean IN CELTIC?
>From your citation:
>Perhaps one of the most telling of the commonalities is simply the
> self-identification as Israelites - the Hibernians - the name of the
> Irish and the Scots and the Hebrides Islands off the coast of
> Scotland. The Milesians, one of the early Celtic peoples to come to
> Ireland from Spain had a tradition that they were of the Lost Tribes.
> The name Heber, Eber, or H’berian is found
>From another citation that is not some random fool speculating on
similarities he has noticed:
http://www.ireland.org/irl_hist/hist2.htm
>The sixteenth century scholar, O’Flaherty, fixes the Milesian invasion
> of Ireland at about 1000 B.C. - the time of Solomon. It is proven
> that the Celts whenceover they came, had, before the dawn of history,
> subjugated the German people and established themselves in Central
> Europe.
How could they be the Lost Tribes of Israel if they've been in Ireland
since the time of Solomon, 300 years BEFORE the Lost Tribes of Israel
became "lost"?
http://www.ireland.org/irl_hist/hist4.htm
>All the stories say that the greatest king of those faraway times was
> the twenty first Milesian king, known to fame as Ollam Fodla who
> blessed Ireland in a reign of forty years, some seven or eight
> centuries before the Christian Era.
Let us first hear the Hebrew etymology of "Ollam Fodla", and then
explain how their 21st king ruled in Ireland before the Babylonian
captivity.
But if you think that is not enough:
http://www.irishclans.com/articles/milesians1.html
tells one of the Milesian stories:
>One of the last invasions of Ireland recorded in the book is that of
> the Milesians, also known as the Gaels or the Sons of Mil. These
> people are said to be the true ancestors of the Irish race.
>>The legend of the Milesians is an amazing one, and covers half the
> then known world. This very amended version of the story starts in
> Scythia, the name given by the ancient Greeks after about 800 BC to
> the homeland of the Scythians in the southeast part of Europe,
> eastward from the Carpathian Mountains to the Don River.
>>Scythia was ruled by the King Fenius and was the land of a nomadic
> people famous for their horsemanship. One day a poisonous snake bit
> the King's grandson Gaedhuil (Green Gael). His father, Nuil, carried
> the boy to the Israelites, where Moses healed him with his staff.
>>Moses told the boy that his descendants would travel to a land where
> there were no snakes, an island in fact that lay in the setting track
> of the sun (to the west). Later in the story after much traveling
> either Gaedhuil, with a new name of Milesius, or a son of Gaedhuil
> with this name is found in Spain. Here he has a wife named Scota who
> is the daughter of an Egyptian Pharoah and he is a King of the land.
>>Milesius had a brother named Ith, who discovered an Island. In the
> course of investigating whether it was the legendary Innisfail
> (Island of Destiny), Ith was wounded by the Tuatha de Danaan (Gaelic
> for People of the Goddess Danu), and died on the journey home to
> Spain. Upon their arrival home, the remaining explorers found that
> King Milesius had died. His sons along with their mother Scota led a
> force that returned to punish the Tuatha de Danaan for killing Ith.
> After a large battle they conquered the Tuatha de Danaan and took
> control of Ireland. The mother Scota was killed in the fight and her
> surviving sons, Eber and Eremon, became rulers of the land.
Thus, the ancient Milesians came from lived in Scythia which is a
thousand miles from the Holy Land. Their ancestor was good buddies
with Moses, had a descendant who married the daughter of an Egyptian
Pharoah (oops, that is a NO NO. He married a non-Israelite, so by
Deuteronomy and your nincompoop logic, even if he was an Israelite,
all of his descendants were "bastards".
And the Eber of the Milesians was the grandson of the Egyptian
Pharoah. Therefore he could NOT have been the Eber of the Bible,
unless Shem, who was the other Eber's great-grandfather, was the
father of an Egyptian Pharoah (ignoring the fact that only one
generation before, a flood had wiped out all the world's peoples,
presumably including any Egyptians. But we're talking nincompoop
logic here.)
>http://www.ireland-information.com/heraldichall/irishboysnames.htm> Irish Boys Names
> The 100 Most Popular Male Irish Names, 1999
Given that Ireland is Catholic, and most of the people speak English
rather than Irish (approximately 2% of the Irish people speak Irish as
their native language), why would the list of popular Irish names in
1999 say anything about ancient Celts?
Rank Name Gaelic Equivalent Meaning/Origin
> 1 Conor Concobhar Gaelic: 'hound lover'
What is the Hebrew word this comes from? What is the Hebrew for
"hound lover"?
> 10 Dylan
What is the Hebrew word this comes from?
> 12 Cian Cian Gaelic: 'ancient', Cain, Kian and Kean are variants
What is the Hebrew for "ancient"?
> 13 Ryan Ryan Gaelic: 'little king'
What is the Hebrew for "little king"
> 17 Mark Marcas Mars: The Roman God of War
Oops. Maybe the Irish are descended from the Romans instead!
> 23 Stephen Stiofán, Steafán Greek: 'crown', Christin martyr
Or the Greeks?
> 25 Oisin Óisín Gaelic: deer, a legendary figure
What is the Hebrew word for "deer"
etc.
You've shown that many Irish Catholics choose Biblical names. Now
show us that Celtic has any significant similarity to ancient Hebrew
(and don't bother with the silly things mentioned on that web page
above. Half the world's languages match some of the patterns he
mentions.
Oh, here is a more thorough rendition of the supposed links between
the Bible and Celtic folklore.
http://www.ucc.ie/celt/published/T100054/text026.html
It says that the language of the Scythians was Gortighern, which was
the pre-Babel language, and that the Irish ancestors had left Babel
before the tower was built and therefore theirs is the original tongue
of mankind.
If you want an entertaining mythology, read the whole silly book:
http://www.ucc.ie/celt/published/T100054/
Now, nincompoop, let us see some REAL evidence for your theory.
lojbab
