Well said, Mr. August,
Let's repeat shallow dunce's statement once again so we can savor the
moment:
> > > Now...I dunno JK well enough to hate him. I despise his apparent
"Aryan
> > > agenda" and won't condone it in the least but despising it is not
> > > immediately equatable to "hate".
Do most Christians "hate" or "despise" feminazis and jews for their
backward, counterproductive, STUPID ideas and proposals and policies? It's
doubtful that most Christians do, even though the despicable results are
certainly worthy of disdain and disrespect.
But it's abundantly clear from this forum that jews and feminazis DO hate
and despise anyone who would defend the "Aryan Race", even though they may
not have the slightest idea what they're talking about.
So let's define the Aryan Race for them:
Here's the New American Desk Encyclopedia:
(Sanskrit: noble), name once used for the family of languages now known as
Indo-European. The word acquired political connotations in Nazi Germany,
being interpreted as "Nordic" or non-Jewish in race, and has thus been
discredited in modern usage.
Here's the Merriam-Webster Collegiate Dictionary
Main Entry: 1Ary·an
Pronunciation: 'ar-E-&n, 'er-; 'är-y&n
Function: adjective
Etymology: Sanskrit Arya noble, belonging to the people speaking an
Indo-European dialect who migrated into northern India
Date: 1839
1 : INDO-EUROPEAN
2 a : of or relating to a hypothetical ethnic type illustrated by or
descended from early speakers of Indo-European languages b : NORDIC c --
used in Nazism to designate a supposed master race of non-Jewish Caucasians
having especially Nordic features
3 : of or relating to Indo-Iranian or its speakers
Main Entry: 2Aryan
Function: noun
Date: 1851
1 : INDO-EUROPEAN
2 a : NORDIC b : GENTILE
Main Entry: In·do-Ar·y·an
Pronunciation: "in-dO-'ar-E-&n, -'er-; -'är-y&n
Function: noun
Date: 1881
1 : a member of one of the peoples of the Indian subcontinent speaking an
Indo-European language
2 : one of the early Indo-European invaders of southern Asia
3 : a branch of the Indo-European language family that includes Hindi,
Bengali, Punjabi, and other languages spoken primarily in India, Pakistan,
Bangladesh, and Sri Lanka -- see INDO-EUROPEAN LANGUAGES table
- Indo-Aryan adjective
What's missing from these dictionary definitions?
What is it that the jews who control our press and airwaves don't want us to
know about Aryans?
Iranians and Afghanis are Aryans.
Why do the jews not want the American people to know that Iranians and
Afghanis are Aryans. Why is it that the jews in the US demonize the mere
term "Aryan"? What is it about jews that they go postal when someone merely
mentions the word "Aryan"? What is it that set off shallow dunce? Why did
shallow dunce accuse us of being "Aryans"? So that she could then have a
target to shoot at?
I met many people in Tehran who're whiter than White Americans. Many of
them look identical in appearance to the White Race of the US. It's obvious
that we have a common ancestor, and that this common ancestor just could not
have lived that long ago.
Not one single jew in the world comes even close in appearance to either the
Aryans of Iran or the Aryans of the US. They're all obvious freaks of
nature.
Why do the jews not want us to know about this?
Because they know that Americans wouldn't go along with their "wars on
terrorism" if they knew that the targets of OUR terrorism were fellow
Aryans.
To justify this "war on terrorists", the jews in the US have used all kinds
of tricks to make the American people think that we're dealing with a bunch
of mad dog Muslims, when the simple fact is that WE are the mad dogs for
going along with and supporting these infinitely STUPID jews. In almost a
year and a half in Muslim countries, I never met even one Muslim who wasn't
a perfect gentleman, which is something I can say about NO jew I ever met.
Our jewsmedia images of Tehran are exactly the opposite of what I witnessed
personally, and they're intentionally misleading.
Do jews deserve our disrespect for this? Of course they do. Do they
deserve to be shipped out of the country for it? Of course they do. Does
this mean that we "hate" the jews? I personally have jewish "friends" in
many parts of the world, including Russia--and for their sake, they all need
to finally comprehend that it's way past time for them to move on.
John Knight
<raugust at ptd.net> wrote in message news:7DNb9.30$Lo4.22984 at nnrp1.ptd.net...
> Dear Shadow Dancer,
>> Is this really an Aryan Nation issue here?
>> Consider that black men between 18 and 30 years of age have the highest
> murder rate in the USA, either the highest or second highest incarceration
> rate, and near the highest non-lethal crime rate in the USA. Consider
that
> black men are considerably less "educable" than black women, who comprise
a
> much higher percentage of the work force than black men. Yet, these
> feminist laws on the books are written ostensibly to protect blacks.
>> Who really hurts here, young black boys who have no positive male role
model
> at all, or whiteys who pay dearly for their funerals or incarceration?
>> EVERYBODY hurts here because of feminist legal drivel. Even Asian
Americans
> hurt, because they end up taking up the slack for the blacks AND (often)
the
> whites, because of education, brain power, and work motivation issues.
>> Women hurt the most because their men are removed from the home by force
or
> by rule of law. I pray to God that you'll rue the day you say that
marriage
> is outdated or outmoded. Women cannot even protect themselves from the
> abuses of other women, and at times require men to rescue them from that
> abuse. I pray to God that you'll rue the day you say men should be
removed
> from sight and summarily murdered. Whether black, white, Native American,
> Asian, Middle Eastern, or Pacific Islander, you women need us men as much
as
> we men need you women. When you completely lose our protective force,
which
> protects you from intruders AND yourselves, you will truly rue the day you
> lost your men, no matter what race. You will even rue the day you were
> born, and will wish you died as a child.
>> This is neither an Aryan issue, nor a Neo-Nazi issue, nor a black or white
> or red or green or purple or blue issue. Race has NOTHING to do with how
> badly the FAMILY overall has been DESTROYED by the feminazis of the 20th
> century. The Holy Bible says that God created man and woman, that a man
> shall leave his mother and father and cleave to his wife, and that they
> should be fruitful and multiply in a monogamous non-adulterous
relationship.
> Feminism turns that whole Godly principle on its ear, and then begs the
> question why so many women end up diseased, beaten, brutally murdered, and
> maimed.
>> Race has nothing to do with our fight. The feminism that created the
entire
> race issue has everything to do with our fight to create and preserve the
> husband and father as the leader of the home, so our sons and daughters
have
> positive male and female role models in two-parent homes.
>> Is that too much to ask, for members of any race?
>>>>> Sincerely,
>>> Richard C. August
>> "John Knight" <jwknight at polbox.com> wrote in message
> news:IP9b9.18123$Ic7.1554265 at news2.west.cox.net...> >
> > "Insomniac" <insomniac at winterslight.org> wrote in message
> > news:akipuk$1gv84f$1 at ID-150265.news.dfncis.de...> > > "John Knight" <jwknight at polbox.com> wrote in message
> > > news:kxYa9.15294$Ic7.1436138 at news2.west.cox.net...> > > > "Zayton" <zayton at bellsouth.net> wrote in message
> > > > news:0JRa9.78471$%v4.3260851 at e3500-atl2.usenetserver.com...> > > > >
> > > > > "John Knight" <jwknight at polbox.com> wrote in message
> > > > > news:vlPa9.14084$Ic7.1317648 at news2.west.cox.net...> > > > > >
> > > > > > "Joseph A Nagy Jr" <pagan_prince at charter.net> wrote in message
> > > > > > news:3D6AD985.5090703 at charter.net...> > > > > > > Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote:
> > > > > > > > Bob LeChevalier wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> "John Knight" <jwknight at polbox.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>> OR, we could simply live by the Holy Bible as the
> Constitution
> > > of
> > > > > this
> > > > > > > >>> Christian nation proclaims:
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> The Constitution of this not-Christian-nation proclaims no
> such
> > > > > thing.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> [Bible quotes without ANY Constitutional quotes deleted as
> > > > irrelevant
> > > > > > > >> to the claim].
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> lojbab
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Ah lets just forget this idiot. I've posted twice proof that
> > > prayer
> > > > is
> > > > > > > > not banned from public school, yet him and Mr. August still
> > > contend
> > > > it
> > > > > > is.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > My point being that they will ignore everything we say, no
> matter
> > > how
> > > > > much
> > > > > > > proof to the contrary.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Just because two morons meet on a bus and agree that the moon is
> > made
> > > of
> > > > > > Swiss cheese doesn't mean that the moon is made of Swiss cheese.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Just because a feminazi and a "liberal" agree with each other
that
> > > > school
> > > > > > prayer was never banned doesn't mean that school prayer was
never
> > > > banned:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 1962: Engel v. Vitale. The Court ruled that public
> > > > > > school officials could not require pupils to recite a slate-
> > > > > > composed prayer at the start of each school day, even if the
> > > > > > prayer was nondenominational and pupils who so desired
> > > > > > could be excused from reciting it, because such official
> > > > > > state sanction of religious unerances was an unconsitu-
> > > > > > tional attempt to establish religion.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This was called "BANNING SCHOOL PRAYER".
> > > > >
> > > > > No. this was called banning the government regulation of prayer.
It
> > > > doesn't
> > > > > say anything about the individual's freedom to pray; only the
> > authority
> > > of
> > > > > School officials to tell people whether they can pray or not. Do
you
> > > ever
> > > > > actually read any of the crap you post. half the time you disprove
> > your
> > > > own
> > > > > arguements.
> > > > >
> > > > > Joe
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > This is like the jews who say, when they spray bullets at
Palestinian
> > > > children, "look, they WANTED to die--if they didn't want to die,
they
> > > would
> > > > have dodged the bullets".
> > > >
> > > > The "supreme" court banned a practice which had been PROTECTED under
> the
> > > US
> > > > Constitution and the First Amendment for almost two centuries, just
as
> > our
> > > > Christian Founding Forefathers desired, and BANNED it.
> > > >
> > > > What was that practice? Why, spoken Christian prayer in public
> schools,
> > > of
> > > > course. What the court did was exactly 180 degrees the reverse of
> what
> > > our
> > > > Christian Founding Forefathers envisioned.
> > > >
> > > > Now, what changed in the US Constitution, Joe? Nothing. Did the
> people
> > > > rise up in arms and demand that their children be prohibited from
> saying
> > a
> > > > simple spoken CHRISTIAN prayer in their "public school" classrooms?
> > Why,
> > > > no. The only thing that changed is that we permitted MORON jews to
> > "sit"
> > > on
> > > > the "supreme" court.
> > > >
> > > > Was that a good idea? No. Was it a popular idea? No, to this day,
> > more
> > > > than two thirds of Americans OPPOSE this ruling
> > > > http://christianparty.net/schoolprayer.htm> > > >
> > > > You can weasel word all you want--but it won't change a single fact.
> > > >
> > > > John Knight
> > >
> > > Read your own words.
> > >
> > > You can weasel word all you awnt - but Christian children in schools
> > across
> > > the country will continue to pray and not be bothered about it.
> > >
> > > However, their teachers are forbidden by law to make such prayer
> mandatory
> > > for *everyone*.
> > >
> > > That's the part that "gets" you, isn't it? You'd rather run a Fourth
> > Reich
> > > where all children wore brown shirts and recited "Christian" prayers
> just
> > as
> > > you proscribed.
> >
> >
> > It's truly awesome to envision what a gigantic vacuum must exist where
> those
> > missing 3 1/2 billion brain cells are supposed to be.
> >
> > You can't even accurately paraphrase the simplest statement, understand
> the
> > simplest point, nor comprehend the simplest poll. No wonder Gallup gets
> > away so often with making a verbal statement which 100% contradicts the
> data
> > in its own statistics.
> >
> > Here's the direct quote from the Gallup Poll:
> > ==================================
> > Next I'm going to read a variety of proposals concerning religion and
> public
> > schools. For each one, please tell me whether you would generally favor
or
> > oppose it. First, ... . Next, ... . [RANDOM ORDER]
> >
> > E. Allowing daily prayer to be spoken in the classroom
> >
> > Favor 70%
> > Oppose 28
> > No opinion 2
> > ==================================
> >
> >
> > Tell us what you believe this means, shallow dunce. Demonstrate what it
> is
> > about women's intelligence that makes you think women are more
intelligent
> > than men. Explain how this fits in to your above statements.
> >
> > And while you're at it, would you mind clarifying the difference between
> > "hate" and "despise" once again?
> >
> > > Now...I dunno JK well enough to hate him. I despise his apparent
"Aryan
> > > agenda" and won't condone it in the least but despising it is not
> > > immediately equatable to "hate".
> >
> >
> > John Knight
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>>
