"John Knight" <jwknight at polbox.com> wrote:
>The Holy Bible doesn't just go wandering off into the genealogy of every jew
>it bumps into. Mordecai is the notable exception. The Holy Bible doesn't
>even have this much biographical information on many of the Twelve
>Disciples,
Maybe this should tell you something. More is said about Mordichai
and his activities than is said about MOST of the 12 disciples. Maybe
Mordichai was MORE important.
>who were Israelites,
No. Most were Galileans of completely unknown ethnicity, though
probably most were Jews
>and far more important than some far-away
>jew in Babylon who cheated his way to the top, LIED to the emperor, and
>KILLED tens of thousands of his "enemy" (many of whom were Benjamites and
>other Israelites).
You sure you are reading the same Holy Bible as everyone else?
>This genealogy of Mordecai was listed in order to make the point that
>Israelites in Babylon had miscegenated with jews,
They had to use a whole book of the Bible to tell what several of the
prophets dealt with in a couple of sentences?
>and to point out how tragic such miscegenation is.
Tragedy?
>We understand that in order for you to claim that jews were Israelites, and
>to conceal the role of jews in KILLING millions of Israelites, you need
>desperately to make it appear that Mordecai was a Benjamite.
>>But Mordecai was not a Benjamite.
Yes he was.
>And he was not an Israelite.
>>Mordecai was a *descendant* of a Benjamite, Kish.
Then he was a Benjaminite. A descendant of a Benjaminite is a
Benjaminite.
>Because he was a *jew*, by definition, he could not be an Israelite.
That is YOUR definition. That is NOT the definition of the Holy
Bible, which says that you are a LIAR who speaks the words of your
father the Prince of Liars.
lojbab
