"Peter F" <fell_spamtrap_in at ozemail.com.au> wrote in message
news:j8bsa.287$zV6.12373 at nnrp1.ozemail.com.au...
> Thanks John!
>> A 'triad' of triviality, turgidness and theoretical thinness aptly
describes
> their tenet! Makes me think my theorizing tops theirs any day.
>> [To be specific, e.g. compare their (what they call a) "dyad", with the
> definitional dEPTth and unifying scope of what I mean when I claim and
> conclude (something like) that:
> The AEVASIVE aspect of the human phenotype evolved according to the
> (sub)principle of (implied by) that "ambi-advantageous" adaptations have,
> throughout the phylogeny of animals, tended to be naturally selected-in
> primarily by SHITS (-type "adversity type evolutionary pressures")
> coinciding with "opportunity type evolutionary pressures".]
>> Furthermore, for my taste, theirs also falls down for not being even a
tiny
> bit funny.
The funniest thing I've read in a science related report was some stupid
ramble about using personal pronouns in scientific reporting. Such a
humourless bunch.
John H.
> P
>>
