The main difference between Tapered
Harmony and currently-accepted theory
is that TH uses only 3 dimensions.
Where currently-accepted theory invokes
'dimensions' greater than 3 in efforts to
cross-correlate experimental observables,
TH just uses nonlinear differential calcula-
tions to do the same thing, while remaining
firmly-within just the 3 Dimensions of Com-
mon Sense Space.
Where currently-accepted theory invokes
'dimensions' > 3, TH invokes nonlinear
'density' variations within the infinitely-
divisible UES extreme-fluid [like a com-
monplace fluid, but having no 'particles'
embedded within it].
Dimensions are =Huge= 'enterprises'.
Why add them when everything can be
done in just 3? [with cross-correlation
occurring within a 4th, pseudo-dimen-
sion as it's discussed in AoK, Ap2 [but,
eliminating non-existent 'time' as a
'dimension', which was done only sub-
sequent to AoK's 'publication']].
The cross-correlation actually occurs in
3-space - in nervous systems' massively-
parallel information-processing dynamics,
via the construction of TD E/I-minimized
"biological mass" which, literally, embodies
the cross-correlation as an energy-gradient
within 3-space.
Anyway, the main difference between cur-
rently-accepted theory and TH is that TH
does everything in 3-D, via nonlinear
differential claculations.
The stuff that I've been discussing, recently,
was what I 'saw' while on that long-ago
morning's walk when the NL-P saved me
from getting a bump on the head, and
when I observed the nonlinear sliding of
the gravel out of the dump truck's bed,
and when I observed the illusion of the
'bending' of the hexoganal merry-go-
round's vertices.
When I looked more closely at physical
reality, I saw the "nonlinearity of perspect-
ive [the NL-P] =EVERYWHERE=.
It's Why TH is all nonlinear differential
calculations.
What I've been discussing recently is
the "general usefulness" of the NL-P
as it began to show itself to me on
that morning's walk.
I've been 'Aching' to do this ever since :-]
For reasons I've mentioned, the TD E/I I
'carry' finally became great enough that
I was able to converge upon TD E/I-min-
imization, within it, to address this 'deep'
stuff of TH [hopefully, sufficiently].
Folks tend to 'move away from' it, but,
once one understands it, TD E/I(up) is
Good - it's the Stuff that enables one
to See-Farther.
Without NDT's understanding, however,
seemingly-'interminable' TD E/I(up)
induces folks to converge upon Savage
behavioral by-products of stereotypical
[inductively-learned; AoK, Ap5] TD E/I-
minimization.
The Savagery-inducing TD E/I(up) =seems=
'interminable' 'because' "biological mass"
that embodies understanding with respect
to the manner in which nervous systems
process information has not yet been
constructed within nervous systems.
[Folks who've endure my own behavior
over the years will probably be able to
see, in it, my own repetitive 'throwing-
of-my-self' up-against the 'wall' that
'blocked' the communication of under-
standing - there were no 'words'. So I
set out to 'paint the picture' of the un-
derstanding via reiterative discussions
from various perspectives - which, in the
quantity of Work inherent, also exhbits
the NL-P :-]
The thing that was most-Difficult for me to
do was to proceed, Knowing that I was
causing others to experience TD E/I(up)
while simultaneously Knowing that no-
body else could, yet, See that that
TD E/I(up) was only the instantiation of
the necessary energy-gradient and,
therefore, the 'only' =temporary= Pre-
lude to folks' understanding of what's
in NDT.
"The route to understanding follows a
curved path."
Nonlinearly-curved :-]
And the degree of nonlinearity points
directly to Truth that's not yet understood.
No problem - run to that Fire, and quench
its burning-ness.
Just remember to 'run' NL-P-ly :-]
ken [k. p. collins]
"KP_PC" <k.p.collins at worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:SLOhb.176145$3o3.13057459 at bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
| [...]
