IUBio

DDR Machine

Charlie Wilkes charlie_wilkes at easynews.com
Mon Sep 8 02:11:34 EST 2003


On Mon, 08 Sep 2003 16:18:40 +1000, Matthew Kirkcaldie
<Matthew.Kirkcaldie at newcastle.edu.au> wrote:

>In article <5v8nlvo9789obqcdt6thhdi8ecmdgoh4mh at 4ax.com>,
> Charlie Wilkes <charlie_wilkes at easynews.com> wrote:
>
>> I recall that 25 years ago, "good science" predicted that
>> electromagnetic fields, from broadcast towers and radios, could not
>> possibly disrupt cellular metabolism for the same reason Amy Dahl
>> claims the DDR cannot possibly work -- not enough transmitted energy.
>> But where is the consensus now???
>
>I kinda thought it was pretty much the same as ever.  Any evidence to 
>the contrary?  

All I know is what I read in the papers, my friend.  And this has been
in the papers a lot over the past decade or more.  Here are some
links:

http://www.niehs.nih.gov/emfrapid/extrmurabs/williams.html
http://www.grn.es/electropolucio/omega222.htm
http://www.grn.es/electropolucio/omega91.htm

Charlie








More information about the Neur-sci mailing list

Send comments to us at biosci-help [At] net.bio.net