IUBio

Report of Ecstasy Drug's Great Risks Is Retracted

Peter H. Proctor drp at drproctor.com
Mon Sep 8 17:52:29 EST 2003


On Mon, 8 Sep 2003 16:10:27 -0400, "rfgdxm/Robert F. Golaszewski"
<rfgdxm at vivisectSPAMMERSmochamail.com> wrote:

>   Not necessarily. This is basically a special order shipment. X grams
>of MDMA, and Y grams of methamphetamine were weighed out. Wrong label
>put on both.

        Proper procedure would have been to label each bottle before
or as it was filled,  so you don't have a bunch of mystery bottles
wandering around.    All these procedures have been worked out to
prevent pharmacy errors. 

         Remember,  there are apparently two mislabled bottles here (
tho this is not clear).   So the filler would have to make the same
mistake twice in a row.     The chance of one misfilling is small,
the chance of two misfillings is small-squared.

> It could also be the the lab divided up a large batch of
>both drugs into quantities suitable for this one experiment. 

Something like this is much more likely.   Except I don't  recall the
paper mentioning methamphetamine too.   Perhaps it was for another
series of parallel experiments.  It will be very interesting to see
what the investigation shows.

Dr P






More information about the Neur-sci mailing list

Send comments to us at biosci-help [At] net.bio.net