"David Longley" <David at longley.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:6SolL5Q5KeX$Ewb2 at longley.demon.co.uk...
| In article
| <uYk7b.132148$0v4.9666726 at bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>,
KP_PC
| <k.p.collins at worldnet.att.net> writes
| >"David Longley" <David at longley.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
| >news:ixlTTGLPtbX$EwqY at longley.demon.co.uk...| >| In article
| >| <yQY6b.130812$0v4.9535784 at bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>,
| >KP_PC
| >| <k.p.collins at worldnet.att.net> writes
| >| >"Bill Pascoe" <Bill.Pascoe at newcastle.edu.au> wrote in message
| >| >news:3F568339.1060609 at newcastle.edu.au...| >| >| [...]
| >| Of course you could just conjecture that
| >| neophobia is perhaps a behavioural
| >| antecedent to the plasticity which has in
| >| the past been referred to as "learning"
| >| or "habit formation".
| >
| >I presume you are addressing my comments
| >earlier in this thread, which are not quoted
| >above, which 'grates', but, no, I can't.
| >
| >The big difference is, not that I ignore
| >"learning" or habituation, but that everything's
| >tightly-integrated in NDT.
| >
| >The surmise that you've proposed is an example
| >of the sort of 'dangling' "detail that I addressed in
| >another thread.
| >
| >| [...]
| > [...]
| >| [...]
| > [...]
| >Please forgive what I understand must seem
| >'agrandizment' of the position with which I am
| >'familiar'. It's not that, but the 'seeming' occurs
| >as a function of our individually-unique
| >experiential totals.
| > [...]
| Re-read what you have said and spot the
| self-refuting position it adopts.
The whole 'point' of NDT is that it ain't
when NDT is Comprehended.
Sometimes, there's 'just' Truth, and it's
a Waste to "beat around the bush".
Kindly understand that I'm advocating on
behalf of NDT - because there's a pressing
Need for such.
My 'point' is that, since I'm discussing
exclusively from NDT's perspective, it's
good to, first, Comprehend NDT.
Either you don't, or you're 'pretending'
you don't to see what arises out of such.
In the future, I'll gladly deal with such, but,
just now, I'm pressed for 'time', so let's go
upon our clearly-separate ways.
ken
