"KP_PC" <k.p.collins at worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:rbn9b.139989$0v4.10314282 at bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
| "KP_PC" <k.p.collins at worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
|news:uv49b.141788$3o3.10160362 at bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
| | [...]
| | "KP_PC" <k.p.collins at worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
| |
|news:NvS8b.138320$0v4.10149135 at bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
| | | [...]
| | | "KP_PC" <k.p.collins at worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
| | |
| |
|news:y1J8b.137604$0v4.10098327 at bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
| | | | [...]
| | | | "KP_PC" <k.p.collins at worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
| | |
| |
|news:kjI8b.140462$3o3.10026891 at bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
| | | | | [...]
| | | [...]
| | [...]
| | The NL-P can also be seen in the
| | spiraling of so-called "electron" quantities
| | of energy along the axis of electron micro-
| | scopes.
| |
| | This spiraling results from the fact that
| | the 'electrons' travel as spherical-wave
| | shells which, themselves, carry the dyn-
| | amic 'echo' of the NL-P SSW harmonics
| | out of which they arose. They will, therefore,
| | interact with the electron microscope's
| | axial-symmetrical field in a way that reflects
| | the NL-P, yielding the spirals.
| |
| | The correlated SSW periodicity can be
| | measured via the dimensions of the spirals.
| |
| | Which would make doing the analogous thing
| | with 'atoms' very interesting [very informative
| | with respect to elemental SSW<->UES
| | harmonics.
|| Only, be-cause the SSW<->UES harmonics
| tend toward spherical symmetry, a non-uni-
| form applied magnetic field should be used.
| [I'd want a magnetic field that was nonlinearly-
| tunable. What I'd expect to find is that all SSW's
| ['atoms'] can be seperated into an NL-P 'spect-
| rum because each SSW's NL-P dynamics is
| unique to that 'atom' and an external nonlinearly-
| tunable magnetic field will interact differentially
| with the SSW NL-Ps.]
This's really no 'big-deal' because it's just
another version of what's already done in the
Paschen-Back Effect [transforms the
normal Zeeman Effect into the analomolous
Zeeman Effect]. The only thing that's added
is the nonlinear-tunability of the applied
magnetic field.
Where, in Paschen-Back, the applied mag-
netic field is tuned with respect to a particular
spectral line, my hypothesis is that the nonlinearly-
tunable magnetic field will be tunable with respect
to the whole SSW<->UES harmonic's ['atom's]
spectrum.
The nonlinear-tunability will have to be ex-
tremely-flexible - tunable in sections, the smaller
the sections, the better - like the Calculus's
"differences", only with a magnetic field :-] kpc
| This's is an advanced form of the static non-
| uniform magnetic field that's used in the
| Stern-Gerlach experiment, in which a stream
| of SSQs is bifurcated. My analysis is that that
| bifurcation reflects the 'compression' and 'ex-
| pansion' phases of the SSW<->UES harmonics.
| That is, the non-uniform magnetic field interacts
| differentially with the SSWs depending upon
| whether they are in 'compression' or 'ex-
| pansion' when they pass through the Stern-
| Gerlach apparatus. [This analysis is easily
| tested by adjusting the velocities of the SSWs
| as they pass through the apparatus - to force
| whole-period interaction with the non-uniform
| magnetic field. [Will probably need some
| fine-tuning.]]
|| | [...]
|| Anyway, I'm discussing this stuff now because,
| I'll either Live at last in a couple of weeks, or
| 'die' more, and, if it's the latter thing, then I can
| see no way in which I'll survive, so I thought it
| best to guard against that possibility by getting
| more of Tapered Harmony's stuff out-there
| where folks who want to consider it can do so.
|| I don't expect I've 'convinced' anyone yet re. TH,
| but I know with Certainty that it's a valid, Determ-
| inistic 'equivalent' of traditional 'qm' - so it's too-
| much to let go to Waste if I am to go to Waste.
|| It's 'hilarious'. To try to guard against that
| eventuality, I drove ~39.5 miles today to apply
| for a 2nd part-time job. If I get it, I'll be able to
| stay-afloat, but I'll have nothing left to pursue
| the understanding that I Love.
|| I've been fighting-off the Sorrow inherent by
| racing to a 'milepost' with respect to TH.
|| "But, Ken, how can anyone acknowledge
| the synthesis in NDT when you put yourself
| outside of Modern Physics?"
|| That's just it. Tapered Harmony is a full
| Lover's Embrace of Physics - the 'outside-
| ness' has nothing to do with Physics and
| everything to do with the still-prevailing
| Absence of understanding with respect to
| the way nervous systems process informa-
| tion.
|| That folks 'perceive' my Lover's Embrace
| as 'outsider-ness' is just more PTOFA,
| left uncomprehended. It's why I becan this
| thread by quoting the Thomas Khun excerpt.
|| I've been addressing this deep stuff of NDT
| through this sharing superficially from TH - in
| the hope that some folks'd get the deep stuff
| of NDT.
|| Anyway, "everything's not so terribly bad".
|| The Martina McBride is coming to perform in
| the next town over in a couple of weeks.
|| The thought of it is carrying me :-]
|| Maybe, I'll just "fly Over The Rainbow", too.
|| You know, make it beyond that energy-flow
| threshold :-]
|| Anyway, I'll continue the TH discussion as I
| can - if I don't float away in the 'deluge' [or
| Isabelle's storminess].
|| ken [k. p. collins]
||
