IUBio

The Nonlinearity of Perspective - Re-establishment of Classical Determinism

KP_PC k.p.collins at worldnet.att.net
Wed Sep 17 04:57:02 EST 2003


"KP_PC" <k.p.collins at worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:qxG9b.144719$3o3.10363917 at bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
| "KP_PC" <k.p.collins at worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
|
news:SBE9b.144628$3o3.10353598 at bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
| | [...]
| [...] Earth is a 'big'
| NL-P thing through which the UES passes, which
| is detectable in the geomagnetic field's energy-
| dynamics - so is Sun, so is everything else, at
| all scales, within physical reality, including the
| Universe as a whole [...]

Over the years, I've experienced a twinge
of Sorrow when, one after another, some of
the original stimulus sets [all discussed in AoK]
that "stimmed" the NL-P conceptualization's
reification 'disappeared'

For instance, I've not come across one of
those Children's-playground hexoganal
merry-go-rounds in more than a decade.

Where have they all gone? I want to See
the 'twisting' vertices :-]

Insurance regulations?

Then the fountain where I saw the 'atom'
formed behind the thin-sheet of falling
water was torn-down and rebuilt in the mall
where it was - and the 'atom' 'disappeared'.

Can't find a reason for why they did this. The
original fountain was beautiful. Was it leaking?
Did it take up too much 'precious' space [one
of its nicest features is that it 'rambled', a bit,
right there in the midst of the mall, and that
made it possible to sit by it and not really
'be in the mall :-]?

Then the whole mall where I observed the
toddler's ramp-walking directional-inversions
was torn down ]even though it was a perfectly-
good mall that had been well maintained, and
the only mall in the City where it existed.

Competition from the huge mall in the next
town over?

It's funny - the stuff that grows-'dear' in one's
'heart' - TD E/I-minimization you know :-]

But there's still plenty of stuff to stim
recognition of the NL-P. Everything there is
within physical reality reflects it.

For instance the 'time'-courses of the devel-
opment of new 'realizations' vs. the 'time'-
courses of the use of old 'realizations [which
stuff is discussed in AoK, Ap7 & 8] exhibit
the NL-P.

The NL-P is not 'just' manifested in observable
ways with respect to evewry 'object' within
physical reality. It is also reflected in every
energydynamic underpinning every action
of every object within physical reality - in-
cluding the functioning of nervous systems.

In physical systems, stuff like "inertia" [the
need to apply a 'force' to an 'object' to alter
the 'object's direction of motion is 'just' the
NL-P having to be physically dealt with. That
is, the direction-changing 'force' is 'just' the
highly-'compressed' 'end' of an NL-P energy-
dynamic.

A discussion of a new perspective on nervous-
system function?

Same-old, same-old.

Which, if anyone's been following this NL-P
discussion, should 'ting-a-bell' [should re-
sult in TD E/I-minimization] with respect to
the way I've been going at the communica-
tion of NDT - and, for that matter, the stuffs
of all of the examples cited by Thomas Kuhn
in the quote from his, =The Structure of Sci-
entific Revolutions=.

There's a 'start-up cost' inherent in =all=
energy-flow-directionality changes which,
itself, is all 'just' the NL-P.

Have I yet 'purchased' the change in
'humanity's self-ravaging ways?

ken [k. p. collins]





More information about the Neur-sci mailing list

Send comments to us at biosci-help [At] net.bio.net