One more thing I 'forgot' [disn't realize I wasn't
stating sufficiently], below.
"KP_PC" <k.p.collins at worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:jnkab.147922$3o3.10579349 at bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
| Forgot the 'punch-line...
|| "KP_PC" <k.p.collins at worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
|news:Ghkab.147914$3o3.10578127 at bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
| | CORRECTION below.
| |
| | "KP_PC" <k.p.collins at worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
| |
|news:xFjab.147885$3o3.10574960 at bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
| | | "KP_PC" <k.p.collins at worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
| | |
| |
|news:OBiab.147833$3o3.10569732 at bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | --
| | | | "Schmitd! Schmitd! Ve vill build a Shapel!"
| | | | "KP_PC" <k.p.collins at worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
| | | |
| | |
| |
|news:ce1ab.146449$3o3.10479456 at bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
| | | | |
| | | | | "KP_PC" <k.p.collins at worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
| | | | |
| | | |
| | |
| |
|news:OdW9b.146057$3o3.10446024 at bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
| | | | | | "KP_PC" <k.p.collins at worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
| | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | |
| | |
| |
|news:qxG9b.144719$3o3.10363917 at bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
| | | | | | | "KP_PC" <k.p.collins at worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
| | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | |
| | |
| |
|news:SBE9b.144628$3o3.10353598 at bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
| | | | | | [...]
| | | | |
| | | | | | In physical systems, stuff like "inertia" [the
| | | | | | need to apply a 'force' to an 'object' to alter
| | | | | | the 'object's direction of motion is 'just' the
| | | | | | NL-P having to be physically dealt with. That
| | | | | | is, the direction-changing 'force' is 'just' the
| | | | | | highly-'compressed' 'end' of an NL-P energy-
| | | | | | dynamic.
| | | | | | [...]
| | | | |
| | | | | "Yeah, sure. 'All forces are nonlinear'."
| | | | |
| | | | | Yup, all forces are nonlinear.
| | | | |
| | | | | Be-cause all 'matter' is comprised of
| | | | | 'encapsulated' SSW<->UES harmonics,
| | | | | and, everything within physical reality, 'matter'
| | | | | or not, goes along for the ride upon WDB2T,
| | | | | which itself is nonlinear [giving macroscopic
| | | | | nonlinear SSW behavior such as that which I
| | | | | discussed in the 'black hole' sub-post [part of
| | | | | a post] yesterday.
| | | | |
| | | | | Once one sees such, one cannot look at
| | | | | anything without just-seeing-it.
| | | |
| | | | =A= Proof that all forces are nonlinear has
| | | | beein in Special Relativity all along.
| | | |
| | | | It is that, as an object is accelerated toward 'c',
| | | | what's been referred to as its "mass" heads
| | | | toward infinity. The 'force' underpinning such
| | | | acceleration can be 'broken-down' ad infinitum
| | | | via simple vector addition. When this's done,
| | | | there's no 'funny-business' required, which
| | | | means that no matter how small the 'force', it's
| | | | Nonlinear.
| | | |
| | | | Q.E.D.
By "simple vector addition", I mean that, in an
artificially-restricted 2-D case, if the nonlinearity
is, say, in the x direction on a plane, then each
vector addition, no matter how small delta x gets,
the increment in x always increases in the direc-
tion of the nonlinearity [is continuous and smooth -
the 'curl' is the nonlinearity, and it's 'eccentricity'
correlates both to the applied 'force' and to the
overall energy-flow - in 3-D, the energy-flow
pattern is like a 'blossoming' about the 'mass',
which gains symmetry with respect to all radial
directions, except the direction of the applied
force, as 'c' is approached. Thus, "mass" doesn't
actually increase, except if the applied force
is anthropomorphized, and the whole dynamics
viewed through its 'eyes' [from its perspective].
What's actually happening is that more and
more energy that's put into the production of
the accelerating 'force' 'just' goes to WDB2T,
so the 'force', which through the observations
of the one controling the power that goes into
the generating of the 'force', 'sees' the object's
'mass' as 'increasing', but it's not. It's just that
more and more of the applied energy is going
to WDB2T, instead of into the acceleration of
the object. To the 'force', it appears that 'mass'
is increasing without limit, but what's happening
is that 'encapsulation is breaking-down be-
cause ephemerance has become extremely-
restricted. [Note on the Neuroscience: the same
breaking of encapsulation occurs within nervous
systems that've experienced narrowly - which is
what's happening in the "zone of randomness"
[AoK, Ap4], and which is why a relatively-'un-
familiar' [not "finitized" either positively or neg-
atively] thought 'passes-right-through' without
evoking understanding - the nervous system
cannot 'encapsulate' the thought - cannot 'grasp'
it's correlated energydynamics - cannot "finitize"
it - cannot restrict its ephemerance. When this
happens within persistent interactive dynamics,
they always spiral inwardly and 'implode' when,
upon crossing a global-system TD E/I threshold,
the amygdalar nuclear complex low-'level' "super-
system configuration mechanism" takes control
of the supersystem, imposing stereotypical
configurations, 'engineered' to take a gamble-
exit from the "zone of randomness", upon the
supersystem - because staying in-there would
result in the dis-integration of the supersystem's
knowledge base. These energydynamics are
analogous to the Why of 'c' as it's discussed in
this post.]
Anyway, with respect to "simple vector addition",
sorry - =I= know what I mean:-]
Stuff like this results from the way I'm 'isolated',
with only 'your' books as my 'colleagues' in inter-
action - my 'shorthand' is perfectly adequate for
my own work within TH - I do it all 'graphically', so
verbal symbolization is 'superfluous' in my own
work.
But the my use of the "simple vector addition"
terminology exposes that my 'shorthand' is in-
adequate with respect to communication
with others.
So, please allow me to use your chaulkboard.
Otherwise, please accept my 'apology' for
doing this emergency brain-dump.
It's just that I don't know whether I'm about to
Live or 'die', and I decided that, regardless, the
understanding Must Live.
The Need is in Honoring-Truth.
kpc
| | | |
| | | | In the usual 'typical' conditions [velocities much
| | | | less than 'c' and sizes greater than an 'atom' [an
| | | | SSW<->UES harmonic], it's not necessary
| | | | to deal with the Nonlinearity because it's so small
| | | | that it's 'negligible'.
| |
| | CORRECTION:
| |
| | Whoops! The above statement is Not True as it
| | stands.
| |
| | Macroscopic 'objects' having relatively-large 'mass',
| | like Earth, are easily verified to exhibit NL-P-
| | dependent structural features. {I discussed this
| | aspect of the "translation" between SR, GR and QM
| | and TH, in long-former posts.
| |
| | So, a better way of stating when TH reduces to
| | traditional views is with respect to relative ephemer-
| | ance.
| |
| | When ephemerance is relatively restricted, to the
| | degree of that, the NL-P is always flat-out observable.
|| It's within this realm of ephemerance that TH be-
| comes uniquely-separate from traditional theory, and,
| Necessary with respect to Unification within Physics.
|| kpc
|| | It all comes down to energy's freedom to move.
| |
| | Ephemerance.
| |
| | Which is surely in Why Humans so Love to be Free.
| |
| | [Connection to NDT: When we study and learn this
| | or that, to the degree that we do, the energydynamics
| | within the neural Topology of our nervous systems
| | literally restricts energy's freedom to move [restricts
| | ephemerance], via the construction of microscopic
| | trophic modifications to the neural architecture. It's
| | this restricted ephemerance which, thereafter,
| | exerts its 'inertia[l] force' within neural energydynamics,
| | that allows us to 'remember', work with, further develop,
| | etc., or refute, deny, unlearn, etc. whatever it is that we
| | are attending to [achieving TD E/I-minimization with
| | respect to]. [This last stuff has been in AoK all along -
| | "biological mass", "behavioral inertia", AoK, Ap5, 7 & 8.]
| |
| | kpc
| |
| | | | Tapered Harmony reduces the Universal Nonlinearity
| | | | to the underpinning energydynamics as follows.
| | | |
| | | | All 'matter' is comprised of spherical standing
| | | | waves [SSWs] 'encapsulated' within harmonic
| | | | interaction with a surrounding Universal Energy
| | | | Supply [UES].
| | | |
| | | | When an object approaches 'c', is becomes in-
| | | | creasingly-easy for energy to move in any dir-
| | | | ection =other= than in the direction of the accel-
| | | | eration, and energy does exactly that in order
| | | | to maximize its ephemerance [its freedom to
| | | | move].
| | |
| | | This ephemerance [energy's freedom to move]
| | | =threshold= is what's been referred to as "the
| | | speed of light" ["c"], and it's easy to see why
| | | it's been considered to "be constant" through-
| | | out the Universe, even with respect to the 'dif-
| | | ficult' assertion of Special Relativity that, no
| | | matter how fast a light-source is going, the light
| | | it emits still only proceeds at 'c'.
| | |
| | | Light only proceeds at 'c' be-cause, at that
| | | ephemerance threshold, it's easier for energy
| | | to flow in any direction =other= than the one
| | | pointed-to by the light-inducing source - and
| | | it does so by 'just' leaking back into the UES
| | | extreme-fluid.
| | |
| | | Anyway, that's 'c', See?
| | |
| | | And, BTW, it's =not= 'constant'. It varies as
| | | WDB2T continues to unfold - in the same
| | | way that it varies with respect to the encapsula-
| | | tion dynamics commonly inherent in this or that
| | | transmission medium.
| | |
| | | This 'thread' of TH continues all the way out
| | | to the ultimate fate of the Universe as a
| | | whole [which I've discussed, repeatedly, in
| | | long=former posts].
| | |
| | | kpc
| | |
| | |
| | | | It's the same energydynamic that I discussed
| | | | with respect to so-called 'black holes' in another
| | | | recent post - a break-down of SSW's 'encapsul-
| | | | ation' dynamics.
| | | |
| | | | It's not actually an "increase in mass", but an
| | | | energydynamic in which, as objects are accel-
| | | | erated, 'encapsulation' becomes assymetrical
| | | | be-cause of the interaction of the SSW<->UES
| | | | harmonics with the UES, which is 'forced' to be-
| | | | come more-'pressurized' in the direction of the
| | | | acceleration, which forced-UES-'pressuration'
| | | | is relative 'encapsulation' break-down, which
| | | | occurs rigorously with respect to the one-way
| | | | flow of energy from order to disorder that is
| | | | what's =described= by 2nd Thermo [WDB2T].
| | | |
| | | | In accord with WDB2T, as an object is accelerated,
| | | | increasing quantities of the energy empowering the
| | | | acceleration 'pay the WDB2T cost', as they escape
| | | | the 'encapsulation' dynamics as local UES-'pressure'
| | | | augments, and in rigorous accord with WDB2T,
| | | | as the acceleration continues, more and more of the
| | | | applied energy escapes the SSW<->UES harmonics,
| | | | going in any direction other than the direction of the
| | | | acceleration.
| | | |
| | | | These energydynamics are what physically underpins
| | | | what's been referred to as "inertia".
| | | |
| | | | The Proof is, once again, simple.
| | | |
| | | | If it were otherwise, then whatever underpinned that
| | | | 'exception' condition would be oblivious to WDB2T.
| | | |
| | | | All available evidence substantiates that there is
| | | | nothing within physical reality that is 'oblivious' to
| | | | WDB2T.
| | | |
| | | | So, within the realm of all available physical evidence,
| | | | Q.E.D.
| | | |
| | | | So you see? The SSW<->UES harmonics are =not=
| | | | just an exercise. They are the Solution to all of the
| | | | underpinning energydynamics that've been described
| | | | in both Relativities.
| | | |
| | | | They are the 'doorway' to the underpinning =Whys= :-]
| | | |
| | | | Tapered Harmony goes on and on like this, integrating
| | | | all physical evidence of which I'm aware - Unifying it
| | | | tightly, and explaining Why it is as it is, all in a way
| | | | that reduces directly to one thing: the energy-flow that
| | | | is WDB2T.
| | | |
| | | | I ask that the simple Proofs, above [there are a g'zillion
| | | | more, most just as straightforward], be Refuted by the
| | | | community of Physicists, or that Tapered Harmony's
| | | | position be Communicated.
| | | |
| | | | K. P. Collins
| | | |
| | | | | It's in the heliotrophy of every plant. [Check
| | | | | it out: "As the twig is bent, so grows the tree." -
| | | | | like the one leaning threateningly over my trailer,
| | | | | and every morning glory's periodic blooming :-]
| | | | |
| | | | | And, as reiterated in the preceding post, it's
| | | | | in every possible behavior manifested by
| | | | | any nervous system's host organism - even
| | | | | in the 'nuts and bolts' of learning.
| | | | |
| | | | | "The Nonlinear Universe".
| | | | |
| | | | | 'ting-a-bell'?
| | | | |
| | | | | ken [k. p. collins]
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| |
| |
||
