"KP_PC" <k.p.collins at worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:jO5cb.156358$3o3.11156089 at bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
| [...]
| "KP_PC" <k.p.collins at worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
|news:UIXbb.155645$3o3.11103967 at bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
| | [...]
| | "KP_PC" <k.p.collins at worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
|news:eQiab.147844$3o3.10570799 at bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
| | | "KP_PC" <k.p.collins at worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
|news:Yk0ab.146378$3o3.10475274 at bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
| | | | [...]
| | The cellular constituents surely difract such 'eddy'
| | currents, [and they probably self-difract and refract]
| | and that'd enhance the tuning dynamics, because,
| | for instance, if the endoplasmic reticulum's 'spheroid-
| | al structure deformed in a 'Coulomb-force' correlated
| | way, such difraction [and refraction] within the
| | periodicities could be rigorously-coupled to experience
| | iff the constitution of the endoplasmic reticulum shows
| | variation that can be correlated to experience.
| [...]
| |...]
| | These energydynamics could also tune mitochondrial
| | function, which adds a whole other 'layer' of tuning
| | capabilities - low energy output: 'recognize' but
| | don't 'act'; high-energy: 'recognize' and 'act' - and
| | all gradations in-between.
| |
| | Etc., etc. etc.
| | [...]
Of course the conformation of the microtubule cyto-
skelleton could be, and Probably is, tuned via the
'Coulomb forces' that are right-there in the ionic
conductances. This microtubule tuning would, for
instance, make possible the dynamic adjustment
of 'instantaneously'-active synaptic configurations -
which would constitute a way of tuning 'memory' at
the cellular 'level'.
This is an obvious extension of memory-tuning
dynamics that I've formerly discussed with respect
to neural glia function that is referred to in AoK, Ap5.
These memory-tuning dynamics Probably work in a
tightly-coupled way, and each would also have to be
coupled to DNA-RNA tuning, but, at this 'point' at
least, I see the microtubule stuff as being relatively-
passive with respect to DNA-RNA tuning. That is, it
takes instructions from the DNA-RNA tuning dynam=
ics - probably in the form of its constituent protein
incorporations - rather than being active with respect
to DNA-RNA tuning. This distinction is subtle because
the microtubule functionality that is being hypothe-
sized here would, of course, feed-back into the
DNA-RNA tuning.
At this 'point', the 'spheroidal'-surround structural
Topology and nuclear proximity of the endoplasmic
reticulum give it higher-precedence with respect to
the larger 'Coulomb force" DNA-RNA tuning hypothe-
sis that I've been discussing.
Anyway, all of this cellular Topology is tunable via
the infinitely-divisible 'Coulomb forces' that are
right-there in the ionic conductances.
I'll be Surprised if all of this, and other stuff that
remains to be discussed, is not Verified via ex-
periment.
ken [k. p. collins]
