kenneth collins wrote:
> "kenneth collins" <kenneth.p.collins at worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
> news:B%NNd.167849$w62.141776 at bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...> | [...]
>> || The "magnetic moments" of 'atoms'
> || are 'just' the same energy-gradient-
> || differential stuff.
> ||
> || Kepler's 'constant' swept-areas?
> || Same-old, same-old.
> ||
> || 'gravity' too.
>> The "dis-integration" of 'atoms', in what's
> been referred to as "radioactive decay",
> is 'just' energy being "metered-out" be-
> cause, as the Universe expands, the en-
> ergy-"pressure" of this energy-gradient
> decreases, so the energy that is 'trapped'
> within the 'atoms' that happen to locally
> 'experience' such universal energy supply
> 'pressure' decreases' can no longer be
> 'contained' within them, so energy goes,
> from them, into the universal energy sup-
> ply. It's this continuous-outporing of en-
> ergy from 'atoms' that empowers every-
> thing, and which is what's described by
> 2nd Thermo [WDB2T].
Crank physics.
The real physics of the nature of radioactive decay is well understood.
The latter theoretical structures also supply numbers that match observations.
Anyone can come up with a 'thoeory' that only involves vague description and
some catchy words. Let's see the maths.
--
Dirk
The Consensus:-
The political party for the new millenium
http://www.theconsensus.org
